Ai Phone Screening

NTRVSTA vs iCIMS: An In-Depth Look at AI Phone Screening Features

By NTRVSTA Team4 min read

NTRVSTA vs iCIMS: An In-Depth Look at AI Phone Screening Features (2026)

In the competitive landscape of talent acquisition, the choice between NTRVSTA and iCIMS for AI phone screening can significantly impact recruitment efficiency. A recent survey revealed that organizations using AI phone screening experience a 30% reduction in time-to-hire. This article provides a detailed comparison of NTRVSTA and iCIMS, focusing on their AI phone screening capabilities, integration options, and overall effectiveness for recruiting operations.

Key Features of AI Phone Screening

When evaluating NTRVSTA and iCIMS, it’s essential to consider their core features. NTRVSTA offers real-time AI phone screening, which allows candidates to engage in live conversations 24/7. In contrast, iCIMS primarily focuses on video assessments, which, as recent data shows, yield a candidate completion rate of only 40-60%.

Comparison of AI Phone Screening Features

| Feature | NTRVSTA | iCIMS | |-------------------------------|-------------------------------|--------------------------------| | Real-time Screening | Yes | No (asynchronous video only) | | Candidate Completion Rate | 95%+ | 40-60% | | Integration Options | 50+ ATS integrations | 30+ ATS integrations | | Languages Supported | 9+ (including Spanish, Mandarin) | Primarily English | | Fraud Detection | Yes | No | | Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, EEOC | EEOC compliant | | Best For | High-volume recruiting | General-purpose recruiting |

Pricing and Value Proposition

NTRVSTA's pricing tiers typically range from $2,000 to $5,000 per month, depending on the volume of screenings and integrations required. iCIMS, on the other hand, operates on a custom pricing model, often leading to higher costs for similar services.

Key Differentiators

  • NTRVSTA: The standout feature is its real-time phone screening capabilities, which have led to a candidate completion rate exceeding 95%. This is particularly beneficial for high-volume industries such as healthcare and logistics, where speed and efficiency are critical.

  • iCIMS: While it lacks real-time screening, it offers robust reporting features and a wide range of integrations, making it suitable for organizations that prioritize analytics over immediate candidate interaction.

Limitations to Consider

  • NTRVSTA: While it excels in phone screening, its reporting capabilities, though adequate, may not be as comprehensive as those offered by iCIMS.

  • iCIMS: The reliance on video assessments can deter candidates, reducing overall completion rates. Additionally, its pricing model may not be as cost-effective for smaller organizations.

Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Analysis

When comparing TCO, it’s crucial to factor in not only the licensing costs but also the associated costs of implementation, training, and ongoing support. For NTRVSTA, the average setup time is 2-3 business days, while iCIMS can take up to two weeks due to its complex integration needs.

Hidden Costs to Watch For

  • iCIMS: Organizations often overlook potential hidden costs associated with extended training and support, which can add an additional 20% to the TCO.

  • NTRVSTA: While generally straightforward, companies must ensure they have the necessary ATS integrations in place to maximize the platform's effectiveness.

Our Recommendation

  1. For High-Volume Recruiters: Choose NTRVSTA. Its real-time phone screening and high completion rates make it ideal for industries like healthcare and logistics, where rapid hiring is essential.

  2. For Analytics-Focused Organizations: Opt for iCIMS. If your organization prioritizes data and reporting capabilities and can accommodate longer candidate engagement processes, iCIMS may be the better fit.

  3. For Small to Mid-Sized Businesses: Consider NTRVSTA. Its competitive pricing and efficient phone screening features provide significant ROI for organizations without extensive recruiting resources.

Conclusion

As talent acquisition continues to evolve in 2026, the choice between NTRVSTA and iCIMS for AI phone screening should be guided by specific organizational needs and goals.

Actionable Takeaways:

  1. Assess your recruitment volume and speed requirements to determine if real-time screening is essential.
  2. Calculate the total cost of ownership for both platforms to ensure budget alignment.
  3. Consider the importance of analytics versus immediate candidate interaction when selecting a solution.

Streamline Your Recruitment Process Today!

Discover how NTRVSTA's AI phone screening can enhance your recruiting operations and improve candidate engagement.

Book a Demo

Need help automating this workflow?

Activate NTRVSTA to deploy real-time AI interviews, resume scoring, and ATS syncs tailored to your hiring goals.

Book a Demo
Ai Phone Screening

What Most Recruiters Get Wrong About AI Phone Screening

What Most Recruiters Get Wrong About AI Phone Screening In 2026, the recruitment landscape has transformed, yet many recruiters still cling to misconceptions about AI phone screeni

Feb 1, 20264 min read
Ai Phone Screening

NTRVSTA vs JazzHR: Which AI Phone Screening Solution is Worth the Cost?

NTRVSTA vs JazzHR: Which AI Phone Screening Solution is Worth the Cost? As of February 2026, the recruitment landscape is evolving rapidly, with AI phone screening solutions at the

Feb 1, 20264 min read
Ai Phone Screening

How to Integrate AI Phone Screening with iCIMS to Boost Efficiency

How to Integrate AI Phone Screening with iCIMS to Boost Efficiency (2026) In 2026, companies that integrate AI phone screening with their Applicant Tracking System (ATS) are discov

Feb 1, 20263 min read
Ai Phone Screening

7 Costly Mistakes Businesses Make with AI Phone Screening

7 Costly Mistakes Businesses Make with AI Phone Screening In 2026, organizations are investing heavily in AI phone screening to optimize recruitment processes, yet many are stumbli

Feb 1, 20264 min read
Ai Phone Screening

NTRVSTA vs iCIMS: Head-to-Head Comparison of AI Phone Screening Features

NTRVSTA vs iCIMS: HeadtoHead Comparison of AI Phone Screening Features (2026) As of February 2026, the recruitment landscape is increasingly competitive, with organizations seeking

Feb 1, 20264 min read
Ai Phone Screening

AI Phone Screening vs Traditional Interviews: The Case for AI in 2026

AI Phone Screening vs Traditional Interviews: The Case for AI in 2026 As 2026 unfolds, organizations are facing a pivotal moment in talent acquisition. Recent data shows that compa

Feb 1, 20264 min read