NTRVSTA vs iCIMS: Head-to-Head Comparison of AI Phone Screening Features (2026)

As of February 2026, the recruitment landscape is increasingly competitive, with organizations seeking more efficient ways to engage candidates. A recent study showed that companies utilizing AI in their hiring processes can reduce screening times by up to 75%. With this urgency in mind, it's vital to compare leading solutions like NTRVSTA and iCIMS to understand their offerings in AI phone screening. This article will provide a detailed comparison to help you make an informed decision.

Key Features of AI Phone Screening Tools

To kick off the comparison, we’ll examine the critical features that set NTRVSTA and iCIMS apart. These tools aim to streamline the recruitment process, but they do so in different ways.

| Feature | NTRVSTA | iCIMS | |----------------------------|--------------------------------|-------------------------------------| | AI Phone Screening | Real-time 24/7 screening | Scheduled asynchronous interviews | | ATS Integrations | 50+ integrations, including Workday and Bullhorn | 30+ integrations, including Greenhouse | | Candidate Completion Rate | 95%+ | 60% | | Multilingual Support | 9+ languages | English only | | Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliant | EEOC compliant | | Pricing | Starts at $299/month | Starts at $499/month | | Best For | Healthcare, staffing, tech | Large enterprises |

NTRVSTA's real-time AI phone screening provides a significant advantage in candidate engagement, allowing recruitment teams to connect with candidates immediately, which is crucial in high-demand sectors such as healthcare and technology.

Pricing and Accessibility

Understanding pricing structures is crucial for budgeting. NTRVSTA offers a tiered pricing model starting at $299 per month, which is competitive given its extensive features, including real-time phone screening and multilingual support. In contrast, iCIMS starts at $499 per month, which may be a barrier for smaller organizations or those with limited budgets.

Pricing Comparison

• NTRVSTA:

  • Basic: $299/month (up to 100 candidates)
  • Professional: $499/month (up to 500 candidates)
  • Enterprise: $999/month (custom volume)

• iCIMS:

  • Basic: $499/month (limited features)
  • Professional: $799/month (standard features)
  • Enterprise: Contact for pricing (full suite)

Integration Depth and Compatibility

Integration capabilities are essential for ensuring that your recruitment tools work harmoniously with your existing systems. NTRVSTA offers over 50 integrations with popular ATS platforms like Lever, Greenhouse, and Bullhorn, while iCIMS has around 30 integrations, primarily focused on larger-scale systems. This flexibility makes NTRVSTA a more attractive option for organizations looking to enhance their tech stack without extensive overhauls.

Integration Comparison

| Tool | Number of Integrations | Key ATS Integrations | |----------|------------------------|------------------------------------| | NTRVSTA | 50+ | Workday, Bullhorn, Lever | | iCIMS | 30+ | Greenhouse, JazzHR |

Candidate Experience and Engagement

The success of any recruitment tool is ultimately measured by candidate engagement. NTRVSTA boasts a remarkable candidate completion rate of over 95%, significantly higher than iCIMS's 60%. This difference is key; candidates prefer the immediacy of phone screening over asynchronous video interviews, which can lead to drop-offs and dissatisfaction.

Compliance and Security Features

Both NTRVSTA and iCIMS are designed to meet essential compliance standards, but NTRVSTA stands out with its SOC 2 Type II and GDPR compliance, ensuring high-level data security. This is particularly important in industries like healthcare, where sensitive information is handled. iCIMS, while EEOC compliant, may not provide the same level of assurance for organizations handling highly confidential data.

Our Recommendation

When choosing between NTRVSTA and iCIMS, consider the following scenarios:

1. For Small to Mid-sized Businesses: Choose NTRVSTA for its cost-effective pricing and superior candidate engagement features.
2. For Large Enterprises with Complex Needs: iCIMS may be more appropriate due to its extensive suite of features, but be prepared for higher costs.
3. For Healthcare Organizations: NTRVSTA's compliance with SOC 2 Type II and high candidate completion rates make it the ideal choice.

Conclusion

As you navigate the evolving landscape of recruitment technology, consider the following actionable takeaways:

1. Evaluate your organization's specific needs against the features offered by both NTRVSTA and iCIMS.
2. Prioritize candidate experience—favor tools that enhance engagement and completion rates.
3. Assess compliance and security features critically, especially if handling sensitive data.

Investing in the right AI phone screening tool can transform your recruitment process, driving efficiency and improving candidate quality in 2026 and beyond.