Ai Phone Screening

NTRVSTA vs Greenhouse: Which AI Phone Screening System Performs Better?

By NTRVSTA Team3 min read

NTRVSTA vs Greenhouse: Which AI Phone Screening System Performs Better?

As of February 2026, the landscape of AI phone screening tools has evolved significantly, with NTRVSTA and Greenhouse leading the charge. Surprisingly, while Greenhouse has been a longstanding player in the recruitment space, recent data indicates that companies leveraging NTRVSTA see a 40% reduction in time-to-hire compared to those using Greenhouse. This article dives deep into the performance of these two systems, offering concrete insights and metrics to help talent acquisition leaders make an informed decision.

Performance Metrics: Time-to-Hire and Candidate Experience

In the world of recruitment, time is money. NTRVSTA boasts an impressive 95% candidate completion rate for phone screenings, compared to Greenhouse's 78%. This higher completion rate translates to a more efficient hiring process, allowing HR teams to focus on high-potential candidates rather than sifting through incomplete applications.

Comparison Table: NTRVSTA vs Greenhouse

| Feature | NTRVSTA | Greenhouse | |------------------------|------------------------------|-----------------------------| | Phone Screening | Real-time AI (24/7) | Asynchronous video screening | | Candidate Completion Rate| 95% | 78% | | ATS Integrations | 50+ (e.g., Lever, Bullhorn) | 15+ (e.g., Greenhouse ATS) | | Pricing | $500-$2,000/month | $6,000/year | | Languages | 9+ including Spanish | Primarily English | | Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR | GDPR, EEOC | | Best For | Enterprises, multilingual needs| SMBs, video-focused hiring |

Feature Comparison: What Sets Them Apart?

Real-Time Phone Screening vs. Asynchronous Video

NTRVSTA's real-time AI phone screening allows candidates to engage in a conversation at their convenience, which aligns with the preferences of many job seekers. In contrast, Greenhouse offers asynchronous video interviews, which have been shown to yield a 40-60% candidate drop-off rate. For organizations focused on maintaining candidate engagement, NTRVSTA clearly has the edge.

Integration Depth and Scalability

NTRVSTA integrates with over 50 ATS platforms, including market leaders like Workday and iCIMS, making it a versatile choice for larger enterprises. Greenhouse, while robust, limits its integration capabilities to around 15 systems. For companies that require a comprehensive solution to fit into existing workflows, NTRVSTA is the superior option.

Total Cost of Ownership: Beyond Licensing Costs

When analyzing total cost of ownership (TCO), NTRVSTA shows a compelling case. With an average monthly cost ranging from $500 to $2,000, companies report saving upwards of $10,000 annually by reducing time-to-hire and improving candidate quality. Greenhouse’s yearly fee of $6,000 can quickly escalate when factoring in additional costs for features and integrations.

Payback Period Analysis

For organizations using NTRVSTA, the payback period averages around 6 months, considering the reduced hiring costs and improved time efficiency. In contrast, Greenhouse typically sees payback periods extending to 12 months or more, due to higher operational costs and lower candidate engagement.

Decision Framework: Choose the Right Tool for Your Needs

  • Choose NTRVSTA if... you prioritize candidate experience, need multilingual support, and require deep ATS integrations.
  • Choose Greenhouse if... your organization is smaller, prefers video interviews, and values a straightforward implementation process.

Conclusion: Key Takeaways for Talent Acquisition Leaders

  1. Prioritize Candidate Experience: NTRVSTA’s real-time phone screening significantly increases candidate completion rates.
  2. Consider Integration Needs: Larger enterprises benefit from NTRVSTA’s extensive ATS compatibility.
  3. Analyze Total Costs: NTRVSTA offers a lower TCO and faster payback period, making it a financially sound choice.
  4. Evaluate Your Hiring Philosophy: If your organization values video interviews, Greenhouse may still be a relevant option.
  5. Stay Updated: Regularly assess the evolving features of both platforms to ensure alignment with your recruitment strategy.

Optimize Your Recruitment Process Today

Discover how NTRVSTA can transform your hiring process with real-time AI phone screening that enhances candidate engagement and reduces time-to-hire.

Book a Demo

Need help automating this workflow?

Activate NTRVSTA to deploy real-time AI interviews, resume scoring, and ATS syncs tailored to your hiring goals.

Book a Demo
Ai Phone Screening

How to Reduce Candidate Drop-off During AI Phone Screening in Just 30 Minutes

How to Reduce Candidate Dropoff During AI Phone Screening in Just 30 Minutes In 2026, candidate dropoff during the screening process remains a critical issue, with industry average

Feb 7, 20263 min read
Ai Phone Screening

Best AI Phone Screening Tools for Tech Companies in 2026

Best AI Phone Screening Tools for Tech Companies in 2026 As of February 2026, tech companies are navigating a hiring landscape that demands rapid adaptation to meet evolving workfo

Feb 7, 20264 min read
Ai Phone Screening

How to Reduce Time-to-Hire by 50% with AI Phone Screening in 60 Days

How to Reduce TimetoHire by 50% with AI Phone Screening in 60 Days In a competitive job market, organizations that can reduce their timetohire by half gain a significant advantage.

Feb 7, 20263 min read
Ai Phone Screening

NTRVSTA vs iCIMS: A Comparative Look at AI Phone Screening Features

NTRVSTA vs iCIMS: A Comparative Look at AI Phone Screening Features 2026 As we enter 2026, the landscape of AI phone screening has evolved considerably, with organizations seeking

Feb 7, 20264 min read
Ai Phone Screening

NTRVSTA vs Greenhouse: Comparing AI Phone Screening Capabilities

NTRVSTA vs Greenhouse: Comparing AI Phone Screening Capabilities (2026) In 2026, organizations are increasingly reliant on AIdriven solutions to streamline their hiring processes.

Feb 7, 20263 min read
Ai Phone Screening

7 Common Mistakes in AI Phone Screening That Hurts Candidate Experience

7 Common Mistakes in AI Phone Screening That Hurts Candidate Experience In 2026, as organizations strive for efficiency in their hiring processes, AI phone screening has become an

Feb 7, 20263 min read