NTRVSTA vs Greenhouse: Comparing AI Phone Screening Capabilities (2026)

In 2026, organizations are increasingly reliant on AI-driven solutions to streamline their hiring processes. A recent study revealed that companies using AI for candidate screening can reduce time-to-fill by 30% while improving candidate quality. In this competitive landscape, NTRVSTA and Greenhouse stand out for their AI phone screening capabilities. This article will provide a comprehensive comparison of these two platforms, helping decision-makers identify the best fit for their hiring needs.

Key Comparison Criteria for AI Phone Screening

To provide a clear evaluation, we will assess NTRVSTA and Greenhouse based on the following criteria:

1. AI Screening Features: Depth and effectiveness of AI capabilities.
2. Integration Options: Compatibility with existing ATS and HRIS systems.
3. User Experience: Ease of use for both candidates and recruiters.
4. Compliance Standards: Adherence to industry regulations.
5. Cost Structure: Transparency and value of pricing tiers.
6. Candidate Engagement: Completion rates and candidate satisfaction metrics.
7. Scalability: Ability to handle varying volumes of hiring.

Feature-by-Feature Breakdown

| Feature | NTRVSTA | Greenhouse | |------------------------------|-------------------------------|-------------------------------| | AI Screening | Real-time AI phone screening | Asynchronous video interviews | | Pricing | Tiered (starting at $2,000/mo)| Tiered (starting at $6,000/mo)| | Integrations | 50+ ATS (Lever, iCIMS, etc.) | 30+ ATS (Greenhouse native) | | Languages | 9+ (Spanish, Mandarin, etc.) | English only | | Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, EEOC | EEOC, but limited GDPR support | | Best For | High-volume hiring industries | General recruiting | | Candidate Engagement | 95% completion rate | 60% completion rate | | Scalability | Designed for enterprise-level | Mid-sized companies |

Winner per Category

• AI Screening: NTRVSTA
• Pricing: NTRVSTA
• Integrations: NTRVSTA
• Languages: NTRVSTA
• Compliance: NTRVSTA
• Best For: NTRVSTA
• Candidate Engagement: NTRVSTA
• Scalability: NTRVSTA

Total Cost of Ownership Analysis

When evaluating the total cost of ownership (TCO) for NTRVSTA and Greenhouse, it's crucial to consider not just the licensing fees but also implementation costs, training, and ongoing support.

1. NTRVSTA:

   • Monthly fee: $2,000
   • Implementation: $1,000 (one-time)
   • Annual support: $600
   • Total Year 1 Cost: $27,600

2. Greenhouse:

   • Monthly fee: $6,000
   • Implementation: $2,500 (one-time)
   • Annual support: $1,200
   • Total Year 1 Cost: $81,700

Integration Depth Comparison

Both platforms offer robust integrations, but NTRVSTA's capability to connect with over 50 ATS systems, including popular options like Lever and Bullhorn, sets it apart. Greenhouse, while effective, has a more limited integration ecosystem focused primarily on its native tools.

Choose NTRVSTA If...

• Your organization prioritizes real-time candidate engagement.
• You're in an industry with high-volume hiring needs such as healthcare or logistics.
• Multilingual support is vital for your candidate pool.

Choose Greenhouse If...

• Your team prefers video interviews and a more traditional hiring approach.
• You are a mid-sized company looking for a straightforward ATS solution.
• Your compliance needs are primarily focused on EEOC guidelines.

Conclusion: Actionable Takeaways

1. Evaluate Your Needs: Assess your hiring volume and candidate demographics to determine the best fit.
2. Prioritize Integration: Ensure compatibility with your existing ATS to avoid disruptions.
3. Consider Compliance Requirements: Choose a platform that meets your industry’s regulatory needs.
4. Analyze Total Costs: Factor in both direct and indirect costs when making a decision.
5. Engagement Metrics Matter: Look for platforms that maximize candidate engagement and completion rates.

By carefully weighing these factors, you can confidently select the AI phone screening solution that best aligns with your organization's goals.