NTRVSTA vs Greenhouse: Which AI Phone Screening System is Right for You?
NTRVSTA vs Greenhouse: Which AI Phone Screening System is Right for You? (2026)
As of February 2026, the recruitment landscape continues to evolve, with AI phone screening systems becoming indispensable for organizations looking to streamline their hiring processes. Surprisingly, a significant 72% of candidates prefer phone interviews over video interviews, highlighting the need for effective phone screening solutions. In this article, we delve into a detailed comparison of two leading solutions: NTRVSTA and Greenhouse. We’ll analyze their features, pricing, user feedback, and ultimately help you determine which system aligns best with your recruitment needs.
Key Comparison Criteria for AI Phone Screening Solutions
Before diving into the specifics of NTRVSTA and Greenhouse, let's establish the criteria that matter most when evaluating these systems:
- Integration Capabilities: How well does the solution integrate with existing ATS and HRIS systems?
- User Experience: What are the candidate and recruiter experiences like?
- Pricing Structure: What tiers are available, and what do they offer?
- Compliance Features: How do the systems ensure adherence to industry regulations?
- Language Support: Is multilingual support available?
- Unique Features: What differentiates each solution from its competitors?
- User Feedback: What do current users say about their experiences?
NTRVSTA Overview
What NTRVSTA Offers
NTRVSTA specializes in real-time AI phone screening, providing a 24/7 solution that allows recruiters to conduct phone interviews without scheduling conflicts. With over 50 ATS integrations—including popular systems like Lever, Greenhouse, and Bullhorn—NTRVSTA is designed for seamless operation within your existing recruitment ecosystem.
Pricing
NTRVSTA operates on a tiered pricing model:
- Basic: $200/month for up to 100 interviews
- Professional: $500/month for up to 500 interviews with advanced analytics
- Enterprise: Custom pricing for over 500 interviews and dedicated support
Key Differentiator
What sets NTRVSTA apart is its real-time AI phone screening capability, achieving a 95% candidate completion rate compared to the 40-60% typical for video interviews.
Best For
NTRVSTA is ideal for organizations in healthcare and logistics, where high-volume hiring and multilingual support are paramount.
Limitations
While NTRVSTA excels in phone screening, it may lack some advanced ATS features found in dedicated recruitment platforms.
Greenhouse Overview
What Greenhouse Offers
Greenhouse is a comprehensive recruitment platform with a suite of tools for managing the entire hiring process, including AI-driven phone screening capabilities. It is particularly known for its robust analytics and customizable workflows.
Pricing
Greenhouse also uses a tiered pricing model:
- Basic: $400/month for essential features
- Pro: $800/month for enhanced analytics and integrations
- Enterprise: Custom pricing for large organizations with extensive needs
Key Differentiator
Greenhouse is highly regarded for its user-friendly interface and strong emphasis on data-driven hiring decisions, making it best suited for tech companies and larger enterprises.
Best For
Greenhouse is a strong fit for tech companies and staffing agencies looking for a full-featured recruitment platform.
Limitations
The complexity of Greenhouse can be overwhelming for smaller organizations, and its phone screening features may not be as robust as those of NTRVSTA.
Feature Comparison Table
| Feature | NTRVSTA | Greenhouse | |---------------------------|------------------------------|-----------------------------| | Type | AI Phone Screening | Recruitment Platform | | Pricing | From $200/month | From $400/month | | Integrations | 50+ ATS (Lever, Bullhorn) | 20+ ATS (Greenhouse, iCIMS) | | Languages | 9+ (Spanish, Mandarin) | English only | | Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, EEOC | EEOC, GDPR | | Best For | Healthcare, Logistics | Tech, Staffing | | Unique Features | Real-time screening, fraud detection | Comprehensive analytics |
User Feedback Summary
User feedback highlights NTRVSTA's straightforward setup and effective phone screening, with many users reporting reduced screening times from 45 to 12 minutes. In contrast, Greenhouse users appreciate its depth of analytics and customizable features, though some note the learning curve associated with its comprehensive dashboard.
Total Cost of Ownership Analysis
When evaluating TCO, consider both direct costs (licensing fees) and indirect costs (time spent on setup, training, and ongoing maintenance). For a mid-sized company, NTRVSTA may yield a better ROI due to its faster candidate screening process, potentially reducing time-to-hire by 20%.
Conclusion: Making Your Decision
When choosing between NTRVSTA and Greenhouse, consider the following actionable takeaways:
- Assess Your Needs: Determine if your primary requirement is AI phone screening or a full recruitment suite.
- Consider Your Volume: If you have high-volume hiring needs, NTRVSTA's real-time capabilities may serve you better.
- Evaluate Integration Needs: Ensure the solution you choose integrates smoothly with your existing systems.
- Review User Feedback: Look for testimonials and case studies that reflect the experiences of similar organizations.
- Plan for Training: Be prepared for the training requirements associated with more complex systems like Greenhouse.
By considering these factors, you can make an informed decision that aligns with your organization’s recruitment strategy.
Streamline Your Hiring Process Today
Discover how NTRVSTA can enhance your recruitment efforts with real-time AI phone screening and seamless ATS integration tailored to your industry needs.