NTRVSTA vs Greenhouse: AI Phone Screening Features Review 2026

As of February 2026, the landscape of AI phone screening has evolved rapidly, with companies seeking to streamline their hiring processes amid a competitive talent market. A recent survey revealed that organizations using AI-driven phone screening tools saw a 30% reduction in time-to-hire compared to traditional methods. This article dives into a detailed comparison of two key players in this space: NTRVSTA and Greenhouse. We’ll examine their features, pricing, and suitability for various organizations, helping HR leaders make informed decisions.

Key Features Comparison: NTRVSTA vs Greenhouse

When evaluating AI phone screening solutions, it’s crucial to consider specific features that directly impact efficiency and candidate experience. Here’s how NTRVSTA and Greenhouse stack up against each other:

| Feature | NTRVSTA | Greenhouse | |------------------------------|----------------------------------|----------------------------------| | Real-Time Phone Screening | Yes (24/7 Availability) | No (Async video only) | | AI Resume Scoring | Yes (Fraud detection included) | Limited AI scoring | | ATS Integrations | 50+ (e.g., Workday, Bullhorn) | 10+ (e.g., Lever, iCIMS) | | Multilingual Support | 9+ Languages | Primarily English | | Candidate Completion Rate | 95%+ | 40-60% | | Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, EEOC | EEOC compliant | | Pricing | Tiered (Starts at $2,500/month) | Contact for pricing | | Best For | Large enterprises, multilingual hiring | Mid-sized companies |

Winner: Feature-Richness

NTRVSTA emerges as the clear winner in terms of features, particularly with its real-time phone screening capabilities, which significantly enhance candidate engagement.

Pricing and Value Proposition

Understanding the pricing structure is vital for organizations planning their budgets. Here’s a breakdown of the pricing tiers for both NTRVSTA and Greenhouse:

• NTRVSTA:

  • Tier 1: $2,500/month (up to 100 candidates)
  • Tier 2: $4,500/month (up to 250 candidates)
  • Tier 3: $8,000/month (unlimited candidates)

• Greenhouse:

  • Pricing is not publicly available, typically requiring potential customers to contact for a quote. Feedback suggests pricing can start at $6,000/year for basic services.

Key Differentiator: Cost Efficiency

NTRVSTA offers a more transparent and potentially lower-cost solution for organizations with high candidate volumes.

Best Use Cases for Each Platform

• NTRVSTA: Ideal for large enterprises in healthcare, logistics, or staffing that require multilingual support and high candidate throughput. Its real-time screening is particularly beneficial for fast-paced hiring environments.

• Greenhouse: Best suited for mid-sized tech companies looking for a well-rounded applicant tracking system with some AI capabilities but may not need extensive phone screening features.

Limitations

NTRVSTA may require a higher initial investment for smaller organizations, while Greenhouse's lack of real-time phone screening could hinder candidate engagement.

Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Analysis

When evaluating the TCO, consider not just the licensing costs but also the integration expenses, training, and ongoing support. For instance:

• NTRVSTA:

  • Licensing: $30,000/year (Tier 3)
  • Integration Costs: $5,000 (one-time)
  • Training: $2,000 (initial setup)
  • Total: $37,000/year

• Greenhouse:

  • Licensing: Estimated $6,000/year
  • Integration Costs: $5,000 (one-time)
  • Training: $3,000 (initial setup)
  • Total: $14,000/year (for basic services)

Winner: NTRVSTA

While Greenhouse may appear more affordable initially, the comprehensive capabilities of NTRVSTA justify the higher investment, particularly for organizations with significant hiring needs.

Conclusion: Actionable Takeaways

1. Evaluate Your Needs: Determine the volume of candidates you expect and the importance of real-time engagement in your hiring process.
2. Consider Compliance: Ensure that whichever platform you choose adheres to necessary compliance standards relevant to your industry.
3. Factor in Integration: Look for a solution that integrates seamlessly with your existing ATS to avoid costly disruptions.
4. Test Before Committing: If possible, request demos or trial periods to assess how each platform meets your unique requirements.
5. Budget for Hidden Costs: Remember to account for integration and training expenses when calculating your total investment.

In the competitive landscape of AI phone screening solutions, NTRVSTA stands out for enterprises needing robust, real-time capabilities, while Greenhouse serves well for those focused on basic ATS functionalities.