NTRVSTA vs. Greenhouse: A Comparison of AI Phone Screening Capabilities (2026)

In 2026, the recruitment landscape continues to evolve, with AI phone screening emerging as a critical component for organizations aiming to streamline their hiring processes. Despite the increasing popularity of asynchronous video interviews, a recent survey revealed that 78% of candidates prefer real-time phone interactions over video. This insight underscores the importance of selecting the right AI phone screening solution. In this article, we will compare NTRVSTA and Greenhouse, two prominent players in the AI phone screening space, focusing on their capabilities, pricing, and suitability for various organizations.

Understanding AI Phone Screening: Key Criteria for Comparison

When evaluating AI phone screening solutions, it is essential to consider several key criteria:

1. Integration Capabilities: How well does the solution integrate with existing Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS)?
2. Language Support: Is multilingual support available for diverse candidate pools?
3. Compliance Standards: Does the solution adhere to legal and regulatory requirements?
4. Candidate Engagement: What metrics are used to gauge candidate experience and completion rates?
5. Scalability: Can the solution handle varying volumes of hiring needs?

NTRVSTA: Leading the Charge in AI Phone Screening

NTRVSTA offers real-time AI phone screening, available 24/7, allowing recruiters to connect with candidates at their convenience. A standout feature is its ability to integrate with over 50 ATS platforms, including Greenhouse, Lever, and iCIMS. NTRVSTA also supports nine languages, catering to a diverse workforce.

• Pricing: Flexible tiers starting from $2,000 per month, with custom pricing for enterprise solutions.
• Key Differentiator: Real-time phone screening capabilities that yield a 95% candidate completion rate, significantly higher than the 40-60% seen with video interviews.
• Best For: Organizations with high-volume hiring needs, such as staffing agencies, logistics companies, and healthcare providers.
• Limitations: Requires initial setup time and may involve training for HR teams.

Greenhouse: An Established Player in Recruitment Technology

Greenhouse is primarily known for its comprehensive ATS features but has recently incorporated AI phone screening capabilities. While it provides a robust platform for managing the hiring process, its phone screening functionality is not as advanced as NTRVSTA's.

• Pricing: Starts at $6,000 annually, with additional costs for advanced features.
• Key Differentiator: Strong analytics and reporting features for tracking hiring metrics.
• Best For: Mid-sized to large organizations looking for a full-suite recruitment solution.
• Limitations: Limited language support (primarily English), which may hinder global outreach.

Feature Comparison Table

| Feature | NTRVSTA | Greenhouse | |---------------------------|---------------------------|--------------------------| | Type | AI Phone Screening | AI Phone Screening (basic) | | Pricing | Starting at $2,000/month | Starting at $6,000/year | | Integrations | 50+ ATS (incl. Greenhouse) | Greenhouse ATS only | | Languages | 9+ (incl. Spanish, Mandarin) | Primarily English | | Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, EEOC | EEOC compliant | | Best For | High-volume sectors | Full-suite recruitment | | Candidate Engagement | 95% completion rate | 60% completion rate |

Total Cost of Ownership Analysis: NTRVSTA vs. Greenhouse

When assessing the total cost of ownership (TCO), it’s crucial to include not just licensing fees but also implementation, training, and operational costs.

• NTRVSTA:

  • Implementation: ~$500
  • Training: Minimal; most users adapt quickly.
  • Total Yearly Cost: ~$26,500 (including licensing and potential training costs).

• Greenhouse:

  • Implementation: ~$1,000
  • Training: Requires dedicated time for onboarding.
  • Total Yearly Cost: ~$7,000 (base fee) + additional for advanced features and training.

Choose Your Solution: Decision Framework

• Choose NTRVSTA if:

  • You require high candidate engagement and completion rates.
  • Multilingual support is essential for your hiring needs.
  • You have a high volume of candidates and need real-time screening.

• Choose Greenhouse if:

  • You are looking for a comprehensive recruitment solution with strong analytics.
  • Your organization primarily operates in English and does not require multilingual support.
  • You prefer a full-suite ATS with integrated phone screening capabilities.

Conclusion: Actionable Takeaways

1. Prioritize Candidate Experience: Opt for solutions that maximize candidate engagement, as seen with NTRVSTA's 95% completion rate.
2. Evaluate Integration Needs: Ensure your chosen screening tool integrates seamlessly with your existing ATS to avoid disruptions.
3. Assess Language Requirements: For organizations with a diverse candidate pool, multilingual capabilities can significantly enhance outreach.
4. Consider Total Costs: Look beyond upfront costs to understand the full financial impact over time.
5. Test Before Committing: Take advantage of free trials or demos to gauge how well each solution meets your specific needs.