NTRVSTA vs JazzHR: Which AI Phone Screening Solution is Better for Staffing Agencies? (2026)

As of February 2026, staffing agencies are under increasing pressure to streamline their hiring processes while maintaining high-quality candidate experiences. A recent report revealed that staffing firms that implemented AI phone screening solutions saw a 30% reduction in time-to-hire, highlighting the significant impact these tools can have. In this landscape, NTRVSTA and JazzHR emerge as two leading contenders for AI phone screening. But how do they stack up against each other in terms of features, pricing, and overall effectiveness for staffing agencies? This analysis will provide a detailed comparison to help you make an informed decision.

Feature Comparison: NTRVSTA vs JazzHR

When selecting an AI phone screening solution, it's crucial to consider various features that directly affect your hiring efficiency. Below is a feature-by-feature breakdown between NTRVSTA and JazzHR.

| Feature | NTRVSTA | JazzHR | |-------------------------------|-----------------------------|-------------------------------| | AI Phone Screening | Yes (real-time) | Yes (asynchronous) | | ATS Integrations | 50+ (incl. Bullhorn) | 25+ (limited to certain ATS) | | Multilingual Capability | 9+ languages | English only | | Candidate Completion Rate | 95%+ | 60% | | Fraud Detection | Yes | No | | Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR | EEOC compliant | | Pricing | $500-$2,000/month | $39-$99/month | | Best For | High-volume staffing firms | Small to medium businesses | | Limitations | Enterprise-ready, complex | Limited features for large scale |

Winner: NTRVSTA

NTRVSTA's real-time phone screening and extensive ATS integrations make it a superior choice for staffing agencies looking to enhance operational efficiency.

Total Cost of Ownership Analysis

When evaluating the true cost of ownership, it’s essential to look beyond just the pricing tiers. Consider the following factors:

• NTRVSTA: With pricing starting at $500/month, agencies can expect to see a rapid ROI due to reduced screening times and higher candidate completion rates. For instance, if an agency screens an average of 100 candidates per month, the cost per hire could drop significantly, leading to a payback period of just 2-3 months.

• JazzHR: While more affordable at $39-$99/month, the lower completion rates and asynchronous screening can lead to longer hiring cycles. This could ultimately increase costs related to prolonged vacancies and potential loss of business.

Takeaway: Choose NTRVSTA for better long-term cost efficiency.

Integration Depth Comparison

Integration capabilities are vital for staffing agencies, as they allow for seamless workflow between recruiting tools.

• NTRVSTA offers over 50 integrations with popular ATS platforms like Bullhorn, Greenhouse, and iCIMS, enabling staffing firms to embed AI phone screening directly into their existing workflows.
• JazzHR, while providing some integrations, falls short with only 25 options, which may require additional manual processes.

Conclusion: NTRVSTA's extensive integration options provide a more streamlined experience.

Scoring Framework

To help you evaluate which solution is best for your staffing agency, here’s a scoring framework based on critical aspects:

| Criteria | Weight (%) | NTRVSTA Score | JazzHR Score | |-----------------------------|------------|----------------|--------------| | Feature Set | 30 | 9 | 6 | | Pricing | 20 | 7 | 8 | | Integration Depth | 25 | 9 | 5 | | Candidate Experience | 25 | 9 | 6 | | Total Score | 100 | 8.0 | 6.25 |

Decision Framework

• Choose NTRVSTA if: You are a high-volume staffing agency needing real-time screening and extensive ATS integrations.
• Choose JazzHR if: You are a small to medium-sized business focused on cost-effective solutions with basic features.

Conclusion: Key Takeaways

1. Select NTRVSTA for its real-time phone screening capabilities and higher candidate completion rates, which can drastically reduce your time-to-hire.
2. Consider total cost of ownership rather than just monthly fees; NTRVSTA’s comprehensive features can lead to quicker ROI.
3. Evaluate integration needs carefully; NTRVSTA offers more options, making it a better fit for complex staffing operations.
4. Prioritize candidate experience; NTRVSTA's 95% completion rate indicates a more favorable candidate interaction compared to JazzHR.

For staffing agencies aiming to enhance their recruitment process, NTRVSTA stands out as the more effective solution in 2026.