NTRVSTA vs JazzHR: AI Phone Screening Comparison for Staffing Agencies (2026)

The staffing landscape has undergone a seismic shift in recent years, particularly with the integration of AI phone screening technologies. In 2026, staffing agencies are facing pressure to enhance candidate experiences while maintaining efficiency. A surprising 72% of candidates prefer phone interviews over video, indicating a critical need for solutions that prioritize real-time interactions. This article dives into a comprehensive comparison between NTRVSTA and JazzHR, focusing on their AI phone screening capabilities tailored for staffing agencies.

Key Comparison Criteria for Staffing Agencies

When evaluating AI phone screening solutions, staffing agencies should consider several factors:

• Integration Capabilities: Ability to connect with existing ATS and HRIS systems.
• AI Features: Depth of AI capabilities, including scoring, fraud detection, and multilingual support.
• User Experience: Ease of use for both recruiters and candidates.
• Compliance Standards: Adherence to industry regulations.
• Cost Efficiency: Total cost of ownership beyond just licensing fees.

Feature-by-Feature Breakdown

| Feature | NTRVSTA | JazzHR | |-------------------------|-----------------------------------|----------------------------------| | AI Phone Screening | 24/7 real-time screening | Asynchronous video interviews | | Pricing | Starts at $2,000/month | Starts at $399/month | | Integrations | 50+ ATS integrations (e.g., Bullhorn, Greenhouse) | Limited integrations | | Languages | 9+ languages including Spanish and Mandarin | Primarily English only | | Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, EEOC, GDPR | EEOC compliant | | Best For | High-volume staffing agencies | Small to mid-sized companies | | Limitations | Enterprise-focused, may require more setup | Limited advanced AI features |

Winner: NTRVSTA

NTRVSTA stands out with its real-time phone screening capabilities, which align with candidate preferences and provide higher completion rates (95% compared to JazzHR's 60% for video).

Total Cost of Ownership Analysis

Understanding the total cost of ownership (TCO) is crucial for staffing agencies. While JazzHR may seem more affordable at first glance, NTRVSTA’s efficiency can lead to significant long-term savings. Here’s a breakdown:

• NTRVSTA:

  • Licensing: $2,000/month
  • Average time saved per hire: 33 minutes (reducing screening time from 45 to 12 minutes)
  • Annual savings: $10,000 (based on an average recruiter salary of $60,000)

• JazzHR:

  • Licensing: $399/month
  • Average time saved per hire: 10 minutes (screening time of 30 minutes)
  • Annual savings: $2,500

Conclusion on TCO

While JazzHR has a lower upfront cost, NTRVSTA’s efficiency leads to a lower TCO over time, making it the preferable choice for high-volume staffing.

Integration Depth Comparison

Integration capabilities are vital for staffing agencies that rely on multiple software solutions. NTRVSTA boasts over 50 ATS integrations, including popular platforms like Bullhorn and Greenhouse. In contrast, JazzHR offers limited integration options, which can hinder workflow efficiency.

Choose NTRVSTA if...

• Your agency operates at a high volume and requires real-time phone screening.
• You need robust integration capabilities with your existing ATS.
• Multilingual support is a priority for your diverse candidate pool.

Actionable Takeaways

1. Prioritize Real-Time Screening: Choose NTRVSTA for its ability to conduct real-time phone interviews, catering to candidate preferences and improving completion rates.
2. Evaluate Total Cost of Ownership: When assessing solutions, calculate the long-term savings associated with reduced screening times and improved efficiency.
3. Consider Integration Needs: Ensure that the solution you choose seamlessly integrates with your existing technology stack to avoid operational disruptions.