Ai Phone Screening

NTRVSTA vs iCIMS: Comparison of Features and Pricing for 2026

By NTRVSTA Team4 min read

NTRVSTA vs iCIMS: Comparison of Features and Pricing for 2026

As of January 2026, the AI recruiting landscape has evolved significantly, yet many organizations still grapple with choosing the right solution for their needs. A striking 72% of companies report that their talent acquisition teams struggle with candidate engagement during the screening process. This statistic underscores the critical need for effective tools that not only streamline hiring but also enhance candidate experience. In this analysis, we will dissect the features and pricing of NTRVSTA and iCIMS, two prominent players in the AI phone screening arena, to help you make an informed decision.

Key Comparison Criteria for AI Phone Screening Solutions

Before diving into the specifics, it’s essential to establish the criteria for comparison:

  • Feature Set: Core functionalities and unique offerings.
  • Pricing Structure: Clear breakdown of costs associated with each solution.
  • Integration Capabilities: Compatibility with existing ATS and HRIS systems.
  • Compliance: Adherence to relevant regulations and standards.
  • Support and Training: Quality and availability of customer support.
  • Best Use Cases: Ideal company types or industries for each solution.
  • Limitations: Honest assessments of potential drawbacks.

Feature Comparison: NTRVSTA vs iCIMS

| Feature | NTRVSTA | iCIMS | |--------------------------------|-------------------------------------|-------------------------------------| | Real-Time Phone Screening | Yes (24/7 availability) | Limited (async video options only) | | AI Resume Scoring | Yes (includes fraud detection) | Basic scoring capabilities | | Integrations | 50+ ATS integrations (e.g., Workday, Bullhorn) | 40+ ATS integrations | | Languages Supported | 9+ languages (Spanish, Mandarin) | Primarily English | | Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, EEOC compliant | EEOC, various local laws | | Candidate Completion Rate | 95%+ (vs 40-60% for video) | 60-70% | | Best For | High-volume hiring in healthcare, tech, logistics | General recruiting across industries | | Limitations | Higher initial setup cost | Limited real-time engagement features |

Feature Insights:

NTRVSTA excels in providing real-time phone screening capabilities, which is crucial for maintaining candidate engagement. With a 95% candidate completion rate, it significantly outperforms iCIMS, which primarily offers asynchronous video options. This makes NTRVSTA particularly suitable for industries like healthcare and logistics, where timely communication is vital.

Pricing Structure

Understanding the pricing tiers is essential for budget planning. Here’s a breakdown:

  • NTRVSTA:

    • Basic Plan: $3,000/month for up to 500 candidates, includes real-time screening and 10 ATS integrations.
    • Professional Plan: $5,500/month for up to 1,500 candidates, includes advanced AI scoring and 30 ATS integrations.
    • Enterprise Plan: Custom pricing for larger organizations, includes full integration support and compliance features.
  • iCIMS:

    • Core Plan: $4,000/month for basic applicant tracking features.
    • Professional Plan: $6,000/month with added video screening capabilities.
    • Enterprise Plan: Contact for pricing, tailored features based on company size and needs.

Pricing Insights:

NTRVSTA’s pricing is competitive given its feature set, particularly for organizations focused on real-time interactions. In contrast, iCIMS offers a more generalized approach, which may not be as beneficial for those prioritizing candidate engagement.

Integration Depth Comparison

Both platforms offer a range of integrations but differ in depth and effectiveness. NTRVSTA’s 50+ ATS integrations include major players like Workday, Greenhouse, and Bullhorn, ensuring seamless data flow between systems. iCIMS, while having 40+ integrations, often requires additional customization for optimal performance.

Integration Insights:

For organizations heavily reliant on ATS, NTRVSTA’s breadth of integrations provides a significant advantage, reducing the friction often encountered during the hiring process.

Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)

When evaluating TCO, it’s critical to consider not only the licensing costs but also implementation, training, and ongoing support.

  • NTRVSTA:

    • Initial setup: $1,000
    • Annual support: $2,000
    • Total first-year cost: Approximately $46,000 for the Professional Plan.
  • iCIMS:

    • Initial setup: $2,000
    • Annual support: $3,000
    • Total first-year cost: Approximately $75,000 for the Professional Plan.

TCO Insights:

NTRVSTA offers a more favorable TCO, particularly for companies aiming for high-volume hiring with real-time engagement.

Conclusion: Actionable Takeaways

  1. Assess Your Needs: Identify if real-time phone screening or video options are more aligned with your recruitment strategy.
  2. Calculate Total Costs: Consider not just the monthly fees but the entire cost of ownership over the first year.
  3. Evaluate Integration Requirements: Ensure your chosen solution integrates well with your existing ATS to avoid future complications.
  4. Prioritize Candidate Experience: Choose a solution that maximizes candidate completion rates to enhance your hiring process.
  5. Plan for Training and Support: Factor in the level of support and training offered by each provider to ensure smooth implementation.

In summary, while both NTRVSTA and iCIMS have their strengths, NTRVSTA stands out for organizations that prioritize real-time engagement and comprehensive candidate experience.

Transform Your Recruitment Process with NTRVSTA Today!

Ready to enhance your hiring strategy with real-time AI phone screening? Discover how NTRVSTA can improve your candidate engagement and streamline your recruitment process.

Book a Demo

Need help automating this workflow?

Activate NTRVSTA to deploy real-time AI interviews, resume scoring, and ATS syncs tailored to your hiring goals.

Book a Demo
Ai Phone Screening

AI Phone Screening vs Traditional Interviews: Which Method Saves You More Time in 2026?

AI Phone Screening vs Traditional Interviews: Which Method Saves You More Time in 2026? As of January 2026, the recruitment landscape has evolved dramatically, with organizations i

Jan 31, 20264 min read
Ai Phone Screening

Why Your AI Phone Screening Might Be Overrated: Common Misconceptions Busted

Why Your AI Phone Screening Might Be Overrated: Common Misconceptions Busted In 2026, AI phone screening is often touted as the silver bullet for recruiting efficiency. However, a

Jan 31, 20264 min read
Ai Phone Screening

How to Reduce Candidate Drop-Off Rates by 50% with AI Phone Screening in 30 Days

How to Reduce Candidate DropOff Rates by 50% with AI Phone Screening in 30 Days In 2026, the recruitment landscape continues to evolve, yet candidate dropoff rates remain a persist

Jan 31, 20264 min read
Ai Phone Screening

NTRVSTA vs iCIMS: The Ultimate Comparison of AI Phone Screening Features

NTRVSTA vs iCIMS: The Ultimate Comparison of AI Phone Screening Features (2026) In 2026, the demand for efficient recruitment solutions continues to surge, with AI phone screening

Jan 31, 20264 min read
Ai Phone Screening

Best 5 AI Phone Screening Tools for Logistics and Warehouse Hiring in 2026

Best 5 AI Phone Screening Tools for Logistics and Warehouse Hiring in 2026 In 2026, the logistics and warehouse sectors are grappling with unprecedented labor shortages, making eff

Jan 31, 20264 min read
Ai Phone Screening

NTRVSTA vs AI Phone Screening: Which is Better for Executive Search?

NTRVSTA vs AI Phone Screening: Which is Better for Executive Search in 2026? In 2026, the landscape of executive search is evolving rapidly, and organizations are increasingly turn

Jan 31, 20264 min read