NTRVSTA vs. iCIMS: A Deep Dive into AI Phone Screening Features 2026

As of February 2026, the recruitment landscape is rapidly evolving, with AI phone screening emerging as a pivotal tool for talent acquisition. A recent survey indicated that 73% of HR leaders prioritize AI solutions to streamline their hiring processes. This article provides an in-depth comparison of NTRVSTA and iCIMS, focusing on their AI phone screening features, pricing, and ideal use cases, ultimately guiding you to make an informed decision.

Comparison Criteria: What Matters Most in AI Phone Screening

To effectively compare NTRVSTA and iCIMS, we established key criteria that matter to talent acquisition professionals:

1. Feature Set: Capabilities beyond basic screening.
2. Integration Depth: Compatibility with existing ATS and HRIS.
3. Language Support: Multilingual capabilities for diverse candidate pools.
4. Compliance: Adherence to industry regulations.
5. Cost Structure: Total cost of ownership, not just license fees.
6. User Experience: Candidate and recruiter satisfaction metrics.
7. Scalability: Ability to handle varying volumes of applicants.

Feature Comparison: NTRVSTA vs. iCIMS

| Feature | NTRVSTA | iCIMS | |-----------------------------|---------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------| | AI Screening | Real-time AI phone screening | Asynchronous video screening | | Pricing | $3,500/month for 500 candidates | $5,000/month for 500 candidates | | Integrations | 50+ ATS integrations including Workday, Bullhorn | 20+ ATS integrations, including Greenhouse | | Languages | 9+ languages including Spanish and Mandarin | English only | | Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, EEOC compliant | EEOC compliant | | Best For | High-volume sectors like healthcare and logistics | Mid-sized tech firms | | Limitations | Limited advanced analytics compared to iCIMS | Higher cost for similar features |

Winner: Feature Set

NTRVSTA wins this category with its real-time AI phone screening capability, which boasts a 95% candidate completion rate, significantly higher than the 40-60% often seen with video interviews.

Total Cost of Ownership Analysis

When evaluating the total cost of ownership (TCO) for these platforms, consider not just the subscription pricing, but also the costs associated with implementation, integration, and ongoing support.

• NTRVSTA:

  • Monthly Cost: $3,500
  • Implementation: $1,000 (one-time)
  • Integration Costs: $2,000 (one-time)
  • Total Yearly Cost: $55,000

• iCIMS:

  • Monthly Cost: $5,000
  • Implementation: $1,500 (one-time)
  • Integration Costs: $3,000 (one-time)
  • Total Yearly Cost: $79,500

Winner: Cost Structure

NTRVSTA is more cost-effective, saving you approximately $24,500 annually, making it a better option for budget-conscious organizations.

Integration Depth Comparison

Integration capabilities can significantly affect the efficiency of your hiring process.

• NTRVSTA integrates with over 50 ATS platforms, including major players like Workday and Bullhorn. This allows for a streamlined workflow, enabling real-time data transfer and candidate tracking.
• iCIMS offers about 20 integrations, which may limit flexibility for organizations working with multiple platforms.

Winner: Integration Depth

NTRVSTA takes the lead with its extensive ATS integrations, ensuring a smoother transition into your existing hiring ecosystem.

Choose the Right Option for Your Organization

• Choose NTRVSTA if: You are a high-volume employer in healthcare or logistics looking for cost-effective, real-time phone screening.
• Choose iCIMS if: You are a mid-sized tech firm that prioritizes video screening and advanced analytics, and you have a larger budget.

Conclusion: Key Takeaways

1. Real-Time Screening: NTRVSTA's real-time phone screening provides a higher candidate completion rate compared to video screening.
2. Cost Efficiency: NTRVSTA offers a more budget-friendly solution with a total yearly cost that is significantly lower than iCIMS.
3. Integration Advantage: With over 50 ATS integrations, NTRVSTA ensures smoother workflows that can adapt to various hiring environments.
4. Language Support: NTRVSTA’s multilingual capabilities are essential for companies with diverse candidate pools, unlike iCIMS, which is limited to English.
5. Scalability and Compliance: Both platforms meet compliance standards, but NTRVSTA stands out for its scalability and enterprise readiness.

In summary, for organizations needing efficient, cost-effective, and comprehensive AI phone screening solutions in 2026, NTRVSTA emerges as a strong contender.