NTRVSTA vs HireVue: Which AI Phone Screening Solution Saves You More Time? (2026)

As of February 2026, organizations are increasingly turning to AI phone screening solutions to streamline their hiring processes. A recent survey revealed that 68% of HR leaders cite time savings as their primary reason for adopting AI in recruitment. This article compares two popular options—NTRVSTA and HireVue—to determine which solution offers greater time savings for recruitment teams.

Time Savings: A Critical Metric in Recruitment

Time-to-hire is a crucial metric for any recruitment team. According to industry benchmarks, the average time-to-hire in 2026 stands at 36 days. Organizations that effectively leverage AI phone screening can reduce this timeframe significantly. For instance, NTRVSTA claims to cut screening time from an average of 45 minutes per interview to just 12 minutes, while HireVue's asynchronous video interviews typically take around 30 minutes. The efficiency of real-time interactions in NTRVSTA's solution offers a distinct advantage.

Feature Comparison: NTRVSTA vs HireVue

To assess the capabilities of each solution, we established clear criteria: speed of screening, integration capabilities, user experience, and compliance. Here’s a detailed comparison:

| Feature | NTRVSTA | HireVue | |--------------------|------------------------------|-----------------------------| | Screening Speed | 12 minutes per candidate | 30 minutes per candidate | | Integration Depth | 50+ ATS integrations | 30+ ATS integrations | | User Experience | Real-time phone screening | Asynchronous video | | Multilingual Support | 9+ languages | Limited to English | | Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, EEOC | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, EEOC | | Candidate Completion | 95% completion rate | 40-60% completion rate | | Best for | High-volume recruiters | Organizations valuing video |

Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Analysis

When evaluating AI solutions, the total cost of ownership goes beyond just licensing fees. NTRVSTA's pricing starts at approximately $2,500 per month, depending on the scale, while HireVue typically offers packages ranging from $3,000 to $6,000 monthly. To truly understand cost-effectiveness, consider the following:

1. Setup Costs: NTRVSTA requires minimal setup time, usually completed in 2-3 business days. HireVue may require more extensive onboarding due to its video focus.
2. Operational Costs: NTRVSTA’s real-time screening can lead to faster placements, reducing overall hiring costs.
3. Time Savings: If NTRVSTA saves an additional 18 minutes per candidate compared to HireVue, with an average of 50 candidates screened per month, that translates to 15 hours saved monthly.

Integration Depth Comparison

Integration with existing ATS platforms is vital for seamless operations. NTRVSTA boasts over 50 integrations with popular ATS systems like Greenhouse, Lever, and Bullhorn. In contrast, HireVue integrates with around 30 ATS platforms. This depth allows NTRVSTA to fit more easily into existing recruitment workflows, minimizing disruption and accelerating the hiring process.

Choose NTRVSTA if...

• You prioritize speed and efficiency, especially in high-volume recruitment scenarios.
• Your organization needs strong multilingual support for diverse candidate pools.
• You want a solution that integrates widely with your existing technology stack.

Choose HireVue if...

• You prefer a video-centric approach and already have video infrastructure in place.
• Your organization operates in sectors where video interviews are the norm, such as tech or creative industries.
• You're looking for a solution with strong brand recognition and established market presence.

Conclusion: Actionable Takeaways

1. Evaluate Your Needs: Assess whether real-time phone screening or asynchronous video interviews fit your organization's culture and recruitment strategy.
2. Consider Total Cost: Factor in not just the licensing fees but also the time savings and operational efficiencies when calculating TCO.
3. Prioritize Integrations: Ensure that the solution you choose integrates smoothly with your existing ATS to avoid disruptions in your hiring workflow.
4. Test the User Experience: Conduct trials with both NTRVSTA and HireVue to see which interface your recruiters prefer and which yields better candidate engagement.
5. Monitor Metrics: After implementation, continuously track time-to-hire and candidate completion rates to quantify the ROI of your chosen solution.