NTRVSTA vs HireVue: Comparing AI Phone Screening Capabilities (2026)

As of February 2026, the competitive landscape of AI phone screening has evolved significantly. A recent study indicates that organizations utilizing AI-driven phone screening solutions have reduced their time-to-hire by an impressive 40%, a stark contrast to traditional methods. This article compares NTRVSTA and HireVue, two prominent players in the AI phone screening arena, highlighting their unique capabilities, pricing structures, and best-use scenarios.

Key Comparison Criteria for AI Phone Screening

When evaluating AI phone screening solutions, we focus on several critical criteria: feature set, pricing, integrations, compliance, languages offered, user experience, and overall effectiveness in improving hiring outcomes.

| Feature/Criteria | NTRVSTA | HireVue | |-----------------------|--------------------------------|------------------------------| | Type | Real-time AI phone screening | Video and phone screening | | Pricing | Starts at $3,000/month | Starts at $5,000/month | | Integrations | 50+ ATS integrations (e.g., Greenhouse, Bullhorn) | Limited integrations (mostly proprietary) | | Languages | 9+ languages (incl. Spanish, Mandarin) | Primarily English | | Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, EEOC | GDPR, EEOC | | Best For | High-volume, multilingual hiring | Diverse industry applications | | User Experience | 95%+ candidate completion rates | 40-60% candidate completion rates |

NTRVSTA: Real-Time AI Phone Screening Advantages

NTRVSTA excels with its real-time AI phone screening capabilities, allowing candidates to engage with the system 24/7. This flexibility has led to a remarkable 95% candidate completion rate, significantly higher than the 40-60% typically observed with video interviews. The multilingual support of NTRVSTA, covering over nine languages, makes it particularly effective for organizations with diverse candidate pools, such as those in retail and logistics.

Pricing and Value Proposition

NTRVSTA offers a subscription model starting at $3,000 per month, making it an appealing choice for companies looking to optimize their recruiting processes without breaking the bank. The ability to integrate with over 50 ATS platforms, including Workday and iCIMS, further enhances its value proposition.

HireVue: Video and Phone Screening Capabilities

While HireVue is known for its video interviewing capabilities, it also provides phone screening options. However, its pricing starts at $5,000 per month, which may be a barrier for smaller organizations. HireVue's focus on video can limit its effectiveness for candidates who prefer phone interactions, especially in industries like healthcare and logistics, where real-time conversations may yield better insights.

Pricing and Limitations

HireVue's pricing structure can be prohibitive for companies with tight budgets. Its reliance on video screening can also lead to lower candidate completion rates, particularly among those who may be less comfortable with video technology.

Feature Comparison: NTRVSTA vs HireVue

When comparing features, NTRVSTA clearly stands out in several categories:

• Real-time Interaction: NTRVSTA allows candidates to complete phone screenings on their schedule, which is crucial for high-volume hiring.
• Multilingual Capabilities: NTRVSTA supports nine languages, making it ideal for global organizations or those with diverse hiring needs.
• Integration Depth: NTRVSTA's ability to integrate with a wide range of ATS solutions facilitates smoother workflows, particularly for staffing agencies and large enterprises.

Total Cost of Ownership Analysis

Understanding the total cost of ownership (TCO) is essential for making informed decisions.

• NTRVSTA:

  • Monthly Cost: $3,000
  • Integration Costs: Minimal due to extensive ATS compatibility
  • Total Estimated Annual Cost: $36,000

• HireVue:

  • Monthly Cost: $5,000
  • Integration Costs: Potentially higher due to limited compatibility
  • Total Estimated Annual Cost: $60,000+

As illustrated, NTRVSTA offers a more cost-effective solution, particularly for organizations looking to scale their hiring processes without incurring excessive costs.

Our Recommendation

Choosing between NTRVSTA and HireVue depends on your organization's specific needs:

1. For High-Volume Hiring (e.g., Retail/QSR): Choose NTRVSTA for its real-time phone screening and multilingual capabilities.
2. For Diverse Industry Applications (e.g., Tech): HireVue may be suitable if video screening is a priority, but be prepared for higher costs.
3. For Multilingual Needs (e.g., Logistics): NTRVSTA is clearly the better option, offering real-time support in multiple languages.

Conclusion

As AI phone screening continues to reshape recruitment strategies, understanding the nuances between solutions like NTRVSTA and HireVue is critical. Here are three actionable takeaways:

1. Assess Your Needs: Determine whether your organization prioritizes phone or video screening based on your candidate demographic.
2. Evaluate Costs: Consider the total cost of ownership, including integration expenses, to make an informed decision.
3. Prioritize User Experience: Opt for solutions that provide a high candidate completion rate to enhance your overall hiring efficiency.