NTRVSTA vs Greenhouse: Which Has Superior AI Phone Screening Features? (2026)

As of February 2026, the recruiting landscape is evolving rapidly, and AI phone screening is at the forefront of this transformation. A recent survey found that 78% of hiring managers believe AI screening significantly reduces time-to-hire. Both NTRVSTA and Greenhouse offer compelling solutions, but how do they stack up against each other? This comparison will delve into the specifics of their AI phone screening features, pricing, integrations, and more, helping you make an informed decision.

Key Features Comparison: NTRVSTA vs. Greenhouse

When evaluating AI phone screening tools, it’s crucial to look at the core features that differentiate them. Below is a breakdown of how NTRVSTA and Greenhouse compare in essential areas:

| Feature | NTRVSTA | Greenhouse | |---------------------------------|--------------------------------------|--------------------------------------| | AI Phone Screening | Real-time, 24/7 availability | Scheduled calls only | | Resume Scoring | AI-powered with fraud detection | Basic keyword matching | | Multilingual Support | 9+ languages (Spanish, Mandarin) | Primarily English | | ATS Integrations | 50+ integrations (e.g., Lever, iCIMS)| Strong ATS integration (limited languages) | | Candidate Experience | 95% completion rate | 60% completion rate | | Compliance | SOC 2, GDPR, EEOC compliant | EEOC compliant, limited GDPR support | | Pricing | Starts at $500/month | Starts at $1,200/month |

Winner: NTRVSTA

Key Takeaway: NTRVSTA’s real-time phone screening and multilingual capabilities provide a superior candidate experience, while Greenhouse’s strengths lie in its robust ATS integration.

Pricing Tiers and Value Proposition

Understanding the cost structures of both platforms is vital for budgeting. Here’s how the pricing compares:

• NTRVSTA:

  • Basic Tier: $500/month for up to 300 candidates.
  • Advanced Tier: $1,200/month for unlimited candidates and full features.

• Greenhouse:

  • Basic Tier: $1,200/month for core features.
  • Enterprise Tier: Contact for pricing, focusing on larger organizations with dedicated support.

Key Differentiator:

NTRVSTA’s pricing is more accessible for small to mid-sized businesses, while Greenhouse is tailored more toward larger enterprises.

Best Fit for Company Size and Industry

Both solutions cater to different needs based on company size and industry focus:

• NTRVSTA:

  • Best for: Healthcare, staffing/RPO, and retail sectors where high-volume hiring is common.
  • Limitations: May not offer the depth of reporting that larger organizations require.

• Greenhouse:

  • Best for: Larger tech companies that prioritize integration with existing systems.
  • Limitations: Higher cost may deter smaller firms.

Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Analysis

When assessing the TCO, consider not only the licensing fees but also implementation, training, and ongoing support costs.

• NTRVSTA:

  • Implementation: 3-5 days.
  • Hidden costs: Minimal, as it integrates easily with existing ATS systems.

• Greenhouse:

  • Implementation: 5-7 days.
  • Hidden costs: Higher training costs due to complexity.

Recommendation:

For smaller teams, NTRVSTA offers a lower TCO, while Greenhouse may be justified for larger organizations needing extensive features.

Integration Depth Comparison

Integration capabilities play a crucial role in the effectiveness of AI phone screening tools.

• NTRVSTA:

  • Integrates with over 50 ATS platforms, ensuring a smooth workflow from screening to hiring.

• Greenhouse:

  • Strong integration with major ATS platforms but lacks the multilingual support that can be crucial for global teams.

Choose NTRVSTA if:

You prioritize real-time screening, multilingual support, and lower costs.

Choose Greenhouse if:

You require a robust ATS with extensive reporting capabilities and have a larger budget.

Conclusion: Actionable Takeaways

1. Assess Your Needs: Determine if your organization requires real-time screening or if scheduled calls suffice.
2. Consider Company Size: Evaluate which platform aligns with your company size and industry requirements.
3. Budget Wisely: Factor in the total cost of ownership, not just the licensing fee.
4. Prioritize Integration: Ensure the chosen platform integrates well with your existing ATS for a smoother hiring process.
5. Test Features: If possible, request demos to experience the candidate experience offered by both platforms.

In summary, while both NTRVSTA and Greenhouse have their strengths, NTRVSTA stands out for its real-time capabilities and cost-effectiveness, making it an excellent choice for many organizations.