NTRVSTA vs Greenhouse: Which AI Phone Screening Solution is Better for Staffing in 2026?

In the competitive landscape of staffing, the ability to efficiently screen candidates can mean the difference between securing top talent and losing out to competitors. In fact, companies leveraging AI for recruitment report a staggering 70% reduction in time-to-hire. As we navigate 2026, two prominent solutions stand out: NTRVSTA and Greenhouse. This comparison delves into their capabilities, pricing, and unique features, providing staffing leaders with insights to make informed decisions.

Key Comparison Criteria: What Matters Most?

Before diving into the specifics, it's crucial to establish what to look for when evaluating AI phone screening solutions. Key criteria include:

1. Integration Depth: The ability to seamlessly connect with existing ATS platforms.
2. AI Capabilities: The sophistication of the AI in screening and scoring candidates.
3. Multilingual Support: Essential for diverse hiring needs.
4. Compliance: Adherence to regulations such as GDPR and EEOC.
5. User Experience: Candidate engagement and completion rates.
6. Pricing Structure: Understanding total cost of ownership.

NTRVSTA: Real-Time AI Phone Screening

NTRVSTA excels in providing real-time AI phone screening, allowing candidates to engage 24/7 without the hindrance of asynchronous video interviews. This is particularly advantageous in staffing environments where speed is critical.

• Pricing: Contact for pricing; typically ranges from $1,500 to $3,000 per month based on volume.
• Key Differentiator: Real-time phone interviews with a 95% candidate completion rate, compared to Greenhouse's video interview completion rates of around 60%.
• Best For: Staffing agencies needing rapid candidate turnaround, particularly in high-volume hiring sectors like logistics and healthcare.
• Limitations: May require more setup time for ATS integrations.

Greenhouse: Robust ATS with Screening Capabilities

Greenhouse is well-known for its comprehensive ATS features, including built-in phone screening capabilities. However, it may not specialize as deeply in AI-driven phone interviews as NTRVSTA.

• Pricing: Starts at $6,000 annually for basic features, with higher tiers available for additional functionalities.
• Key Differentiator: Integration with a wide range of HR tools and a focus on structured hiring processes.
• Best For: Organizations looking for an all-in-one ATS solution that includes screening but not exclusively specialized in AI.
• Limitations: Phone screening is an add-on rather than the core feature, which may dilute its effectiveness.

Feature Comparison Table

| Feature | NTRVSTA | Greenhouse | |-----------------------------|-----------------------------|----------------------------| | Type | AI Phone Screening | ATS with Screening | | Pricing | $1,500 - $3,000/month | Starts at $6,000/year | | Integrations | 50+ ATS (Lever, Bullhorn) | Extensive (many HR tools) | | Languages | 9+ (including Spanish) | English-focused | | Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, EEOC | GDPR, EEOC compliant | | Best For | High-volume staffing | Comprehensive HR solutions | | Completion Rate | 95% | 60% |

Total Cost of Ownership Analysis

When considering the total cost of ownership (TCO), it’s essential to factor in not just the subscription cost but also the potential savings from reduced time-to-hire and improved candidate quality.

• NTRVSTA: With an average reduction in screening time from 45 minutes to just 12, this translates to significant cost savings in salaries and time management. For a staffing firm hiring 100 candidates monthly, this could save approximately $30,000 annually in lost productivity.

• Greenhouse: While it offers broader functionalities, the integration and training costs can add up. If a staffing firm spends an additional $1,500 on training and integration, the TCO may become less favorable compared to NTRVSTA.

Choose NTRVSTA if...

• You prioritize real-time phone screening and high candidate engagement rates.
• Your staffing agency operates in high-volume sectors where speed is essential.
• You require multilingual capabilities to cater to diverse candidate pools.

Choose Greenhouse if...

• You need a comprehensive ATS solution that includes screening as part of a larger framework.
• Your organization values structured hiring processes and extensive tool integrations.
• Budget constraints make a lower initial cost more attractive, despite potential hidden costs.

Conclusion: Actionable Takeaways

1. Assess Your Needs: Determine whether your primary goal is rapid phone screening or a comprehensive ATS solution.
2. Evaluate TCO: Consider all costs associated with implementation and operation, not just the subscription fee.
3. Prioritize Candidate Experience: Opt for solutions that maximize candidate engagement and completion rates, as these can significantly impact your hiring success.
4. Check Compliance: Ensure that whichever solution you choose adheres to necessary regulations to mitigate legal risks.
5. Plan for Integration: Factor in the time required for setup and integration with existing systems to avoid delays in hiring processes.