NTRVSTA vs. Greenhouse: Which AI Phone Screening Solution is Best for Staffing Agencies in 2026?

As of February 2026, the staffing industry is facing unprecedented challenges in recruitment efficiency, with an estimated 60% of recruiters citing time constraints as a major hurdle. In this landscape, AI phone screening solutions have emerged as a critical tool for staffing agencies aiming to streamline their hiring processes. This article delves into a detailed comparison between two prominent solutions: NTRVSTA and Greenhouse. We will evaluate their features, pricing, integrations, and overall effectiveness to help you determine which option best fits your agency's needs.

Key Evaluation Criteria for AI Phone Screening Solutions

To provide a comprehensive analysis, we’ll assess both NTRVSTA and Greenhouse based on the following criteria:

• Features and Capabilities
• Pricing Structure
• Integrations with Existing Systems
• Language Support
• Compliance Standards
• Target User Base
• Limitations and Drawbacks

Feature Comparison: NTRVSTA vs. Greenhouse

| Feature | NTRVSTA | Greenhouse | |-------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------| | Real-time Screening | Yes, 24/7 AI phone screening | No, async video interviews | | AI Scoring | Yes, with fraud detection | Limited AI capabilities | | ATS Integrations | 50+ (Lever, Greenhouse, Bullhorn, etc.) | Primarily integrates with Greenhouse ATS | | Language Support | 9+ languages (Spanish, Mandarin, etc.) | Primarily English | | Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, EEOC, NYC Local Law 144 | EEOC compliant but lacks local law support | | Candidate Completion Rate | 95%+ | 40-60% for video interviews | | Best For | High-volume staffing agencies | Mid-sized companies | | Limitations | Requires admin access for setup | Limited language support |

Pricing Structure: Understanding Costs

NTRVSTA offers a flexible pricing model based on usage, typically ranging from $300 to $1,500 per month, depending on the volume of screenings. Greenhouse, on the other hand, operates on a tiered pricing structure that starts around $6,000 annually, making it a higher upfront investment. This pricing disparity is crucial for staffing agencies with tight budgets and high turnover rates.

Integration Depth: How Well Do They Connect?

NTRVSTA shines with its ability to integrate with more than 50 ATS platforms, including major players like Bullhorn and iCIMS. This extensive integration capability allows staffing agencies to embed phone screening directly into their existing workflows, reducing the need for dual data entry and streamlining the candidate experience. Conversely, Greenhouse primarily integrates with its own ATS, which can be a limitation for agencies using other systems.

Compliance Considerations: Meeting Legal Standards

In 2026, compliance remains a top concern for staffing agencies. NTRVSTA is notable for its robust compliance framework, adhering to SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, and NYC Local Law 144, which is vital for agencies operating in multiple jurisdictions. Greenhouse, while EEOC compliant, does not offer the same level of local law adherence, potentially exposing staffing agencies to legal risks.

Limitations: Honest Assessments

While NTRVSTA excels in many areas, it does require admin access for setup, which can delay implementation. Greenhouse, while user-friendly, lacks the multilingual capabilities that are increasingly essential in diverse hiring environments, especially for staffing agencies that cater to various demographics.

Our Recommendation: Tailored Solutions for Different Needs

1. For High-Volume Staffing Agencies: NTRVSTA is the clear choice, offering real-time AI phone screening and a high candidate completion rate that aligns with the demands of rapid hiring cycles.

2. For Mid-Sized Companies Already Using Greenhouse: Greenhouse may be more appropriate due to its seamless integration with its own ATS, assuming budget constraints are not an issue.

3. For Agencies Focused on Compliance: NTRVSTA is recommended for those needing to meet stringent compliance standards across multiple jurisdictions.

Conclusion: Actionable Takeaways

1. Evaluate your agency's specific needs and volume to determine the best fit between NTRVSTA and Greenhouse.
2. Consider the importance of compliance and integration capabilities when making your decision.
3. Analyze the total cost of ownership, including potential hidden costs associated with each solution.
4. Prioritize candidate experience; higher completion rates can significantly enhance your staffing process.
5. Stay informed about industry developments and continuously assess how your chosen solution adapts to changing needs.