NTRVSTA vs Greenhouse: Which AI Phone Screening Solution Fits Your Needs Best?

As of February 2026, the recruitment landscape is evolving rapidly, particularly with the rise of AI phone screening solutions. A recent survey revealed that 78% of hiring managers believe that using AI in their recruitment process significantly reduces time-to-hire. Among the leading solutions, NTRVSTA and Greenhouse stand out, but how do they stack up against each other? This article dives deep into the comparative analysis of these two platforms, helping you make an informed decision tailored to your organization's unique needs.

Understanding the Core Offerings

Both NTRVSTA and Greenhouse provide AI phone screening capabilities, but their approaches and additional features vary significantly.

• NTRVSTA: Focuses on real-time AI phone screening, allowing candidates to engage 24/7. The platform boasts a 95% candidate completion rate, significantly higher than the typical 40-60% seen in video interviews. It integrates with over 50 ATS systems, including Greenhouse, Workday, and Bullhorn, making it a versatile choice for diverse recruitment environments.

• Greenhouse: Primarily known for its robust applicant tracking system, Greenhouse offers AI phone screening as an additional feature. While it provides a comprehensive suite of recruitment tools, its phone screening capabilities are often seen as secondary, lacking the real-time engagement that NTRVSTA excels at.

Feature Comparison: NTRVSTA vs Greenhouse

| Feature | NTRVSTA | Greenhouse | |-----------------------------|------------------------|------------------------| | Type | AI Phone Screening | AI Phone Screening (Add-on) | | Pricing | $1,200/month (basic) | Contact for pricing | | Integrations | 50+ ATS (incl. Greenhouse) | Primarily Greenhouse-focused | | Languages | 9+ (incl. Spanish, Mandarin) | English only | | Compliance | SOC 2, GDPR, EEOC | GDPR, EEOC | | Best For | High-volume hiring | Companies needing ATS | | Limitations | Newer in the market | Phone screening is secondary |

Real-Time Screening: A Key Differentiator

One of the most significant advantages of NTRVSTA is its real-time AI phone screening. Candidates can engage with the system anytime, leading to a 95% completion rate. In contrast, Greenhouse's phone screening feature operates asynchronously, which may lead to lower engagement rates.

Total Cost of Ownership Analysis

When comparing the total cost of ownership for these solutions, consider not just the subscription fees but also implementation costs, training, and potential hidden costs.

• NTRVSTA: Typically costs $1,200/month, with easy integration into existing ATS systems. Most teams complete setup within 2-3 business days.

• Greenhouse: Pricing can vary significantly based on features selected. Implementation may require additional costs if opting for extensive customization.

Integration Depth Comparison

NTRVSTA's strength lies in its extensive integration capabilities. With over 50 ATS integrations, it can seamlessly connect with systems like Workday and Bullhorn, making it suitable for organizations with diverse hiring needs. Greenhouse primarily focuses on its own ATS features, which could limit flexibility if you are using multiple systems.

Choose NTRVSTA If...

• You require real-time phone screening capabilities to enhance candidate engagement.
• Your organization has a high volume of applicants, particularly in industries like healthcare or logistics that benefit from rapid screening.
• You need a solution that integrates easily with multiple ATS platforms.

Choose Greenhouse If...

• Your primary need is a comprehensive ATS and you prefer an all-in-one solution.
• You have a lower volume of candidates and can manage with asynchronous phone screening.
• Your organization is already heavily invested in the Greenhouse ecosystem.

Conclusion: Actionable Takeaways

1. Assess Your Needs: Determine whether real-time engagement or a robust ATS is more critical for your recruitment strategy.
2. Calculate Total Costs: Factor in hidden costs when evaluating pricing for both platforms.
3. Prioritize Integration: Ensure the solution you choose integrates well with your current systems to avoid operational disruptions.
4. Test Usability: If possible, conduct trials of both platforms to gauge user experience from both recruiter and candidate perspectives.
5. Plan for Implementation: Allocate time and resources for setup, especially if you choose a solution with extensive integration needs.