NTRVSTA vs Greenhouse: The AI Phone Screening Showdown for 2026

As of February 2026, the recruitment landscape is evolving rapidly, with AI phone screening systems emerging as a crucial tool for talent acquisition leaders. A recent survey revealed that organizations using AI phone screening saw a 45% reduction in time-to-hire, translating to significant cost savings. This article dives into a detailed comparison between NTRVSTA and Greenhouse, two leading players in the AI phone screening market, to help you determine which solution best fits your organization's needs.

Understanding the Key Differences: NTRVSTA and Greenhouse

When evaluating NTRVSTA and Greenhouse, it’s vital to consider features, pricing, integrations, and unique strengths. NTRVSTA shines in real-time AI phone screening with a focus on multilingual capabilities, while Greenhouse is recognized for its applicant tracking system (ATS) integration.

Comparison Criteria

1. Features: Real-time phone screening vs. video interviews
2. Pricing: Tiered pricing models vs. contact for pricing
3. Integrations: Number and depth of ATS integrations
4. Languages: Multilingual support
5. Compliance: Adherence to industry regulations
6. Best for: Specific company types or sizes
7. Limitations: Honest assessments of each solution

Feature-by-Feature Breakdown

| Feature | NTRVSTA | Greenhouse | |-----------------------|-------------------------------|-------------------------------| | Type | AI Phone Screening | ATS with Video Interviews | | Pricing | $1,200/month (basic tier) | Contact for pricing | | Integrations | 50+ ATS (e.g., Lever, iCIMS) | 30+ ATS | | Languages | 9+ (incl. Spanish, Mandarin) | English only | | Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliant | EEOC compliant | | Best For | High-volume recruiting | Mid to large enterprises | | Limitations | Limited ATS integrations | Higher price point |

Total Cost of Ownership Analysis

When calculating Total Cost of Ownership (TCO), consider not only the license costs but also implementation, training, and ongoing support. NTRVSTA's total cost averages around $14,400 annually for small to mid-sized organizations, while Greenhouse can reach upwards of $30,000 annually, especially for larger firms needing extensive customization and support.

Integration Depth Comparison

NTRVSTA boasts over 50 ATS integrations, seamlessly connecting with platforms like Lever and Bullhorn. This allows for smooth transitions and data flows, enhancing the recruiting process. Greenhouse, while strong in ATS capabilities, falls short with fewer integrations, which can hinder flexibility for companies using multiple systems.

Choose NTRVSTA if...

• Your organization prioritizes real-time, 24/7 phone screening capabilities.
• You require multilingual support to engage a diverse candidate pool.
• You are seeking a cost-effective solution with extensive ATS integration options.

Choose Greenhouse if...

• You are focused on a comprehensive ATS with strong video interview features.
• Your organization has a larger budget for customized recruitment solutions.
• You prefer a platform with robust analytics for tracking candidate performance over time.

Conclusion: Actionable Takeaways

1. Assess Your Needs: Evaluate your organization's specific requirements—real-time phone screening or comprehensive ATS functionalities.
2. Calculate TCO: Consider not just the upfront costs but the total cost of ownership, including integration and support expenses.
3. Prioritize Integration: Ensure that the chosen solution integrates well with your existing systems to avoid disruptions in the hiring process.
4. Consider Compliance: Verify that the selected platform meets relevant compliance requirements for your industry.
5. Test the Waters: Take advantage of free trials or demos to experience the solutions firsthand before making a commitment.