NTRVSTA vs Greenhouse: Price and Feature Showdown for AI Screening 2026

In 2026, the landscape of AI phone screening has evolved significantly, offering organizations the chance to streamline their hiring processes while improving candidate experiences. A surprising 75% of candidates prefer phone interviews over video screenings, highlighting the need for effective AI phone screening solutions. In this article, we will compare NTRVSTA and Greenhouse, two leading platforms, focusing on pricing, features, and overall value to help you make an informed decision.

Pricing Overview: Understanding the Cost Structures

| Name | Pricing Tier | Key Differentiator | Best For | Limitations | |-------------|----------------------------|-----------------------------|------------------------------------|--------------------------------------| | NTRVSTA | Starts at $1,500/month | Real-time phone screening | Large enterprises, multilingual needs | Higher upfront cost for small teams | | Greenhouse | Starts at $2,000/month | Focus on ATS integration | Mid-sized companies, tech firms | Less emphasis on phone screening |

NTRVSTA offers a competitive starting price of $1,500 per month, making it an attractive option for large enterprises with multilingual hiring needs. Greenhouse, while slightly more expensive at $2,000 per month, excels in ATS integration but lacks the same focus on real-time phone screening.

Feature Comparison: What Each Platform Offers

| Feature | NTRVSTA | Greenhouse | |---------------------------|---------------------------|----------------------------| | AI Phone Screening | Yes | Limited | | ATS Integrations | 50+ (Lever, Workday, etc.)| Extensive (focus on ATS) | | Multilingual Support | 9+ languages | English only | | Fraud Detection | Yes | No | | Candidate Completion Rate | 95%+ | 60%+ |

NTRVSTA stands out with its real-time AI phone screening capabilities, supporting over nine languages, and achieving a remarkable 95% candidate completion rate. In contrast, Greenhouse has a broader focus on ATS integration but falls short in phone screening options and language support.

Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Analysis

When considering TCO, it's essential to factor in not only the subscription costs but also potential hidden expenses such as training, implementation, and integration with existing systems.

• NTRVSTA: With a TCO of approximately $20,000 annually for a large team, including training and integration, NTRVSTA proves to be a cost-effective choice given its high completion rates and multilingual support.
• Greenhouse: The TCO can exceed $30,000 annually, particularly for companies requiring extensive training and support due to its primary focus on ATS functionalities rather than phone screening.

Integration Depth: A Critical Factor

Both platforms offer integrations, but the depth and ease of these integrations can significantly impact your hiring workflow:

• NTRVSTA: Seamlessly integrates with over 50 ATS platforms, including Bullhorn and JazzHR. This flexibility allows for quick adaptation to existing workflows.
• Greenhouse: While it offers robust ATS integrations, its focus on ATS-centric features may limit the flexibility needed for real-time screening processes.

Choose NTRVSTA if...

• You prioritize real-time phone screening capabilities and require multilingual support for diverse candidate pools.
• Your organization is large and needs a solution that integrates smoothly with various ATS systems.
• You seek a high candidate completion rate and effective fraud detection features.

Choose Greenhouse if...

• Your company is mid-sized and already heavily invested in ATS systems without a strong need for phone screening.
• You require a platform with extensive hiring process features, albeit at a higher price point.

Conclusion: Key Takeaways for Decision-Making

1. Evaluate Your Needs: Determine whether your organization requires real-time phone screening and multilingual capabilities.
2. Consider Total Costs: Look beyond subscription fees to assess the full TCO, including training and integration.
3. Integration Compatibility: Ensure that the chosen platform integrates well with your existing ATS and enhances your hiring workflow.
4. Candidate Experience Matters: Prioritize solutions that improve candidate completion rates and overall experience during the hiring process.
5. Long-Term Value: Assess the long-term benefits of features like fraud detection and reporting capabilities to justify the investment.

In 2026, the choice between NTRVSTA and Greenhouse will ultimately depend on your organization's specific needs, budget, and hiring goals.