NTRVSTA vs Greenhouse: Phone Screening Features Compared (2026)

In the competitive recruitment landscape of 2026, organizations are increasingly prioritizing candidate engagement during the hiring process. A surprising 75% of candidates report that a positive interview experience significantly influences their decision to accept a job offer. As such, the tools you choose for phone screening can make or break your recruitment strategy. This article delves into a detailed comparison of NTRVSTA and Greenhouse, focusing specifically on their phone screening features to help you determine which solution aligns best with your hiring goals.

Key Features Overview: NTRVSTA vs. Greenhouse

When evaluating phone screening solutions, several criteria are crucial: functionality, candidate experience, integration capabilities, and compliance. Below is a comparison that highlights how NTRVSTA and Greenhouse stack up against each other.

| Feature | NTRVSTA | Greenhouse | |-----------------------|-------------------------------|------------------------------| | Phone Screening Type | Real-time AI phone screening | Scheduled phone interviews | | Pricing | Contact for pricing; typically $1,500-$3,000/month | Starts at $6,000/year | | Integrations | 50+ ATS integrations | Integrates with major ATS | | Languages | 9+ languages (incl. Spanish) | English only | | Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, EEOC | EEOC compliant | | Best For | High-volume recruiting | Mid to large enterprises | | Candidate Engagement | 95%+ completion rate | 40-60% completion rate |

Feature-by-Feature Breakdown

1. Phone Screening Capabilities

Winner: NTRVSTA
NTRVSTA’s real-time AI phone screening allows candidates to engage in a conversation 24/7, significantly enhancing candidate experience. In contrast, Greenhouse relies on scheduled phone interviews, which can lead to delays and lower engagement.

2. Candidate Engagement Metrics

Winner: NTRVSTA
With a completion rate exceeding 95%, NTRVSTA ensures that candidates can easily navigate the screening process. Greenhouse's completion rates hover between 40-60%, indicating a potential drop-off in candidate interest.

3. Integration Depth

Winner: NTRVSTA
NTRVSTA integrates with over 50 ATS platforms, including popular names like Lever, Greenhouse, and Workday, offering flexibility for organizations using varied systems. Greenhouse also integrates with multiple ATS but lacks the same breadth.

4. Pricing Structure

Winner: Greenhouse
While Greenhouse's pricing starts at $6,000 per year, it may appeal to organizations looking for a comprehensive ATS solution. NTRVSTA's pricing is tailored based on usage, making it suitable for high-volume recruiters who may find value in a pay-per-use model.

5. Compliance and Security

Winner: NTRVSTA
NTRVSTA's compliance with SOC 2 Type II and GDPR standards provides peace of mind regarding data protection. Greenhouse is also compliant, but does not offer the same breadth of certifications.

Total Cost of Ownership Analysis

When considering the total cost of ownership (TCO) for each solution, it’s essential to factor in not just licensing costs but also implementation time, ongoing maintenance, and potential hidden costs.

• NTRVSTA: Initial setup typically takes 2-3 business days, with a monthly fee ranging from $1,500 to $3,000 based on usage. Additional costs may arise from ATS integrations.
• Greenhouse: Annual fees start at $6,000, and implementation can take longer due to its complexity. Hidden costs may include training and additional feature add-ons.

Choose NTRVSTA if...

• You operate in a high-volume recruiting environment and require real-time screening capabilities.
• You value high candidate engagement and completion rates.
• Your organization prioritizes multilingual support and compliance rigor.

Choose Greenhouse if...

• You are a mid-sized to large enterprise looking for a comprehensive ATS solution that includes phone screening.
• You prefer a fixed annual pricing model.
• Your team is comfortable with scheduled interviews and the associated logistics.

Conclusion: Actionable Takeaways

1. Prioritize Candidate Experience: Opt for solutions like NTRVSTA that enhance engagement through real-time interactions.
2. Evaluate Your Needs: Assess your organization's size and volume of recruiting to determine the best pricing model.
3. Consider Integrations: Ensure any solution you choose integrates seamlessly with your existing ATS to avoid disruptions.
4. Check Compliance: Confirm that the phone screening tool meets your compliance needs, especially if handling sensitive candidate data.
5. Monitor Metrics: Regularly evaluate candidate completion rates and engagement metrics to optimize your screening process.

As the recruitment landscape continues to evolve, making an informed decision on phone screening solutions will set your organization apart.