NTRVSTA vs Greenhouse: Best AI Phone Screening Features Compared (2026)

As of February 2026, the recruitment landscape is evolving rapidly, with AI phone screening becoming a critical component in streamlining hiring processes. A recent survey revealed that 78% of talent acquisition leaders believe AI enhances candidate experience and reduces time-to-hire. This article dives deep into a head-to-head comparison between NTRVSTA and Greenhouse, two of the leading solutions in AI phone screening, to help HR leaders and recruiting operations professionals make informed decisions.

Key Features of AI Phone Screening Solutions

When evaluating NTRVSTA and Greenhouse, it's essential to consider specific features that directly impact efficiency, candidate experience, and integration capabilities. Here’s a breakdown of the core features that set these platforms apart.

1. Real-Time AI Phone Screening Capabilities

NTRVSTA: Offers real-time AI phone screening 24/7, allowing candidates to engage at their convenience. This approach leads to a remarkable 95% candidate completion rate, significantly higher compared to traditional methods.

Greenhouse: Focuses on structured interviews but lacks the real-time aspect, primarily relying on scheduled interactions which can lead to lower completion rates.

2. ATS Integrations

NTRVSTA: Integrates with over 50 ATS platforms including Lever, Greenhouse, Workday, and Bullhorn. This extensive integration network ensures that data flows seamlessly, reducing administrative overhead.

Greenhouse: While it integrates well with various ATS, its focus is more on enhancing the interview process rather than on robust phone screening capabilities.

3. Multilingual Support

NTRVSTA: Supports more than nine languages, including Spanish and Mandarin, making it ideal for diverse workforces and global hiring.

Greenhouse: Primarily focused on English-speaking candidates, which can limit its effectiveness in multilingual environments.

4. AI Resume Scoring and Fraud Detection

NTRVSTA: Employs advanced AI algorithms to score resumes and detect fraudulent credentials, ensuring that only qualified candidates progress through the hiring funnel.

Greenhouse: Lacks built-in fraud detection, which can expose organizations to risks associated with hiring unqualified candidates.

5. Compliance and Security

NTRVSTA: Fully compliant with SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, EEOC, and NYC Local Law 144, which is crucial for organizations prioritizing data security and regulatory compliance.

Greenhouse: Compliant with major regulations but does not offer the same level of transparency regarding security measures.

Comparison Table

| Feature | NTRVSTA | Greenhouse | |----------------------------|---------------------------------|---------------------------------| | Real-Time Screening | Yes | No | | ATS Integrations | 50+ (Lever, Workday, Bullhorn) | Various | | Multilingual Support | 9+ languages | Primarily English | | AI Resume Scoring | Yes | No | | Fraud Detection | Yes | No | | Compliance | SOC 2, GDPR, EEOC, NYC 144 | Major regulations | | Candidate Completion Rate | 95%+ | Lower than NTRVSTA |

Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Analysis

Understanding the TCO is crucial for any decision-making process. Here’s a breakdown of the costs associated with both platforms:

• NTRVSTA: Pricing starts at $1,500 per month for basic features, with enterprise options available that can exceed $5,000 based on volume and integrations. The TCO includes license fees, implementation costs, and potential savings from reduced time-to-hire.

• Greenhouse: Pricing is tiered, starting around $1,200 per month, but additional costs for integrations and advanced features can escalate expenses. TCO also includes potential inefficiencies from lower candidate completion rates.

Choose NTRVSTA If...

• Your organization requires 24/7 phone screening capabilities.
• You operate in a multilingual environment and need robust language support.
• Compliance with stringent regulations is a top priority.

Choose Greenhouse If...

• Your primary focus is on structured interview processes rather than phone screening.
• You are already heavily invested in their ATS and need to maintain continuity.
• You operate within English-speaking markets with less emphasis on multilingual support.

Conclusion: Actionable Takeaways

1. Prioritize Real-Time Screening: If efficiency and candidate experience are your goals, choose NTRVSTA for its real-time capabilities.

2. Evaluate Compliance Needs: Ensure your chosen platform aligns with your regulatory requirements, particularly if you handle sensitive candidate data.

3. Consider Integration Depth: Look for a solution that integrates seamlessly with your existing systems to minimize disruptions.

4. Assess Multilingual Needs: For global organizations, prioritize platforms that offer multilingual support to enhance candidate engagement.

5. Review Total Costs: Don’t just look at licensing fees; consider the overall TCO and potential cost savings from improved screening processes.

By weighing these insights, recruiting professionals can optimize their hiring strategies and enhance overall organizational effectiveness.