NTRVSTA vs Greenhouse: A Detailed AI Phone Screening Comparison for 2026

As of February 2026, organizations are increasingly turning to AI for their recruitment processes, particularly in phone screening. A recent survey revealed that companies leveraging AI in their hiring processes have seen a 30% reduction in time-to-hire. In this landscape, two prominent players—NTRVSTA and Greenhouse—offer distinct approaches to AI phone screening. Understanding the differences between these solutions is essential for making an informed decision that aligns with your company’s hiring goals.

Key Features: A Direct Comparison

When evaluating AI phone screening solutions, it’s crucial to focus on specific features that impact performance and user experience. Below is a comparison of NTRVSTA and Greenhouse based on key criteria.

| Feature | NTRVSTA | Greenhouse | |------------------------|-------------------------------------|----------------------------------| | AI Phone Screening | Real-time 24/7 | Scheduled interviews | | Integrations | 50+ ATS integrations | Limited integrations | | Multilingual Support | 9+ languages (including Spanish) | English only | | Candidate Completion Rate | 95%+ | 60-70% | | Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, EEOC | GDPR compliant | | Pricing | $500/month (basic) to $2,000/month (enterprise)| Starts at $6,000/year | | Ideal For | High-volume hiring (e.g., retail, logistics) | Tech companies |

Winner: NTRVSTA

NTRVSTA's real-time AI phone screening and high candidate completion rates make it particularly suitable for industries like retail and logistics, where hiring speed is critical.

Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Analysis

Evaluating the total cost of ownership provides insights beyond just the initial licensing fee. For NTRVSTA, the typical monthly pricing ranges from $500 to $2,000 depending on the number of features and users. In contrast, Greenhouse’s annual fees start at $6,000, which can escalate based on the features chosen.

TCO Considerations:

1. Implementation Costs: NTRVSTA typically requires 2-3 business days for setup, whereas Greenhouse may take longer due to its more complex setup requirements.
2. Ongoing Support: NTRVSTA offers 24/7 support, whereas Greenhouse has limited support hours.
3. Integration Costs: NTRVSTA’s extensive ATS integrations minimize additional costs, making it easier to incorporate into existing systems.

Winner: NTRVSTA

NTRVSTA’s lower initial costs and faster implementation times contribute to a more favorable total cost of ownership.

Candidate Experience: Measuring Success

A positive candidate experience is crucial for attracting top talent. NTRVSTA boasts a candidate completion rate exceeding 95%, compared to Greenhouse's 60-70%. This difference is significant; a higher completion rate directly correlates with improved employer branding and candidate engagement.

What Candidates Prefer

• Real-time Interaction: Candidates appreciate the immediacy of real-time phone screening, which NTRVSTA offers.
• Multilingual Options: NTRVSTA's support for 9+ languages caters to a more diverse candidate pool, enhancing accessibility.

Winner: NTRVSTA

The superior candidate experience provided by NTRVSTA positions it as the preferred choice for organizations looking to enhance their employer brand.

Integration Depth: Seamless Connectivity

Integrating AI phone screening with your existing ATS is essential for streamlining the hiring process. NTRVSTA supports over 50 ATS integrations, including popular platforms like Lever, Greenhouse, and Bullhorn, allowing for a smoother workflow. Greenhouse, while offering some integrations, does not match the breadth of NTRVSTA’s capabilities.

Winner: NTRVSTA

NTRVSTA’s extensive integration options provide a significant advantage for organizations with diverse hiring platforms.

Compliance and Security Considerations

In today’s regulatory environment, compliance is non-negotiable. NTRVSTA meets stringent compliance requirements, including SOC 2 Type II and GDPR, ensuring that sensitive candidate information is handled securely. Greenhouse is GDPR compliant but does not offer the same level of security assurances.

Winner: NTRVSTA

NTRVSTA’s robust compliance framework makes it a safer choice for organizations prioritizing data security.

Our Recommendation

Based on the analysis, here are recommendations tailored for different buyer scenarios:

1. For High-Volume Recruiters: Choose NTRVSTA. Its real-time screening and high candidate completion rates are ideal for industries like retail and logistics.

2. For Tech Companies Focused on Integration: If your organization requires deep ATS integration, NTRVSTA's capabilities will yield better results than Greenhouse.

3. For Organizations Prioritizing Candidate Experience: NTRVSTA is the clear choice if you want to enhance your employer brand through a superior candidate experience.

Conclusion: Key Takeaways

1. Real-time AI Phone Screening: NTRVSTA offers immediate interaction, improving candidate experience significantly.
2. Higher Completion Rates: With a 95%+ completion rate, NTRVSTA outperforms Greenhouse in engaging candidates.
3. Robust Compliance: NTRVSTA’s adherence to multiple compliance standards makes it a safer choice for sensitive data handling.
4. Cost-effective: NTRVSTA provides a lower total cost of ownership compared to Greenhouse, particularly for organizations with high-volume hiring needs.
5. Integration Advantage: NTRVSTA supports a broader range of ATS systems, facilitating smoother recruitment workflows.