NTRVSTA vs Greenhouse: A Comprehensive Comparison of AI Phone Screening Features in 2026

In 2026, the landscape of AI phone screening continues to evolve, yet many organizations remain unaware of the significant differences between leading solutions. For instance, a recent survey revealed that 78% of HR leaders believe integrating AI into their recruitment process enhances candidate experience, but only 45% utilize effective AI phone screening tools. This article provides a detailed comparison between NTRVSTA and Greenhouse, focusing on their AI phone screening features, to equip decision-makers with the insights needed to optimize their recruitment strategies.

Key Differentiators: NTRVSTA vs Greenhouse

When comparing NTRVSTA and Greenhouse, understanding their unique offerings is essential. NTRVSTA excels in real-time AI phone screening, providing 24/7 availability and a multilingual interface that supports over nine languages, including Spanish and Mandarin. In contrast, Greenhouse primarily offers asynchronous video interviews, which can lead to lower candidate completion rates—averaging around 40-60%—compared to NTRVSTA's impressive 95%.

| Feature | NTRVSTA | Greenhouse | |------------------------|------------------------------------|-----------------------------------| | Type | Real-time AI Phone Screening | Asynchronous Video Interviews | | Pricing | Starts at $199/month | Starts at $6,000/year | | Integrations | 50+ ATS integrations | Limited integrations | | Languages | 9+ (incl. Spanish, Mandarin) | Primarily English | | Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, EEOC | GDPR, EEOC | | Best For | High-volume recruiting | Mid-sized companies | | Limitations | Requires strong internet access | Limited real-time engagement |

Pricing Structure: A Closer Look

Understanding the cost implications of these solutions is crucial. NTRVSTA's pricing starts at $199/month, making it accessible for small to medium-sized enterprises. Greenhouse, however, operates on an annual pricing model starting at $6,000, which may deter smaller organizations.

Pricing Breakdown:

• NTRVSTA:
  • $199/month (basic features)
  • $499/month (advanced analytics and integrations)
• Greenhouse:
  • $6,000/year (basic plan)
  • Custom pricing for advanced features

Integration Capabilities: Depth Matters

Integration capabilities can significantly impact recruitment efficiency. NTRVSTA boasts over 50 ATS integrations, including popular platforms like Lever and Bullhorn, allowing for a smoother workflow. Greenhouse, while robust, has a more limited integration ecosystem, which may result in additional manual processes.

Integration Comparison:

• NTRVSTA:
  • Integrates with Lever, Greenhouse, Workday, Bullhorn, iCIMS, JazzHR
  • Supports 50+ ATS systems
• Greenhouse:
  • Limited to select ATS partners, requiring potential manual data entry

Candidate Experience: Metrics That Matter

The candidate experience is paramount in recruitment. NTRVSTA's real-time phone screening results in a 95% candidate completion rate, significantly higher than Greenhouse's asynchronous video option. Candidates often prefer the immediacy of phone interviews, which can lead to quicker hiring decisions.

Candidate Completion Rates:

• NTRVSTA: 95%+
• Greenhouse: 40-60%

Compliance and Security: Navigating Regulations

Compliance is non-negotiable in recruitment. NTRVSTA meets stringent compliance standards, including SOC 2 Type II and GDPR, ensuring data protection. Greenhouse also adheres to GDPR and EEOC standards but lacks the same level of security certifications.

Compliance Checklist:

• NTRVSTA:
  • SOC 2 Type II
  • GDPR compliant
  • EEOC compliant
• Greenhouse:
  • GDPR compliant
  • EEOC compliant

Our Recommendation: Choosing the Right Solution

When considering the right AI phone screening tool, organizations must evaluate their specific needs.

1. For High-Volume Recruiters: Choose NTRVSTA for its superior candidate experience and real-time capabilities.
2. For Mid-Sized Companies: Greenhouse may suffice if video interviews align with your strategy and budget is less of a concern.
3. For Multilingual Needs: NTRVSTA is the clear winner, offering extensive language support that can accommodate diverse candidate pools.

Conclusion: Actionable Takeaways

1. Assess Your Recruitment Volume: High-volume recruiters should prioritize NTRVSTA for its efficiency and candidate completion rates.
2. Consider Compliance Needs: Ensure the chosen platform meets your industry’s compliance requirements.
3. Evaluate Integration Requirements: If existing ATS systems are pivotal, NTRVSTA’s extensive integrations may streamline your process.
4. Analyze Budget Constraints: Factor in both upfront costs and long-term value when selecting a solution.
5. Prioritize Candidate Experience: A tool that enhances candidate engagement can lead to better hiring outcomes.