NTRVSTA vs. Current ATS: Discover Which is More Efficient for Phone Screening

In 2026, a staggering 60% of candidates report that they prefer phone interviews over video or in-person formats. This preference highlights a significant gap in how traditional Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) handle the phone screening process. While many ATS platforms focus on resume parsing and initial candidate tracking, they often fall short in delivering an efficient, real-time phone screening experience. NTRVSTA, with its dedicated AI phone screening capabilities, emerges as a strong contender in this space. This article explores the efficiency of NTRVSTA compared to current ATS solutions, providing insights into which option is best for your organization.

The Efficiency Challenge: Traditional ATS vs. NTRVSTA

Traditional ATS platforms typically manage candidate applications and facilitate interview scheduling but often lack robust phone screening features. In contrast, NTRVSTA's real-time AI phone screening allows recruiters to conduct interviews 24/7, significantly reducing the time-to-hire. For instance, organizations using NTRVSTA have reported a reduction in screening time from 45 minutes to just 12 minutes per candidate, allowing recruiters to focus on higher-value tasks.

Key Features Comparison: NTRVSTA vs. ATS

| Feature | NTRVSTA | ATS (e.g., Greenhouse) | |--------------------------|-------------------------------|-------------------------------| | Phone Screening | Real-time AI, 24/7 | Limited scheduling options | | Candidate Completion Rate | 95%+ | 40-60% | | Multilingual Support | 9+ languages | Primarily English | | ATS Integrations | 50+ (e.g., Workday, Bullhorn) | Varies by provider | | Fraud Detection | Yes | No | | Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR | Varies by provider | | Best For | High-volume hiring | General recruitment |

Pricing Structures: Understanding Costs

NTRVSTA operates with a transparent pricing model that scales with your organization's needs. Below are the pricing tiers for NTRVSTA:

• Basic Plan: $500/month for up to 100 screenings.
• Pro Plan: $1,200/month for up to 500 screenings.
• Enterprise Plan: Custom pricing for organizations requiring more than 500 screenings.

In comparison, most ATS systems charge based on the number of users or a flat fee, often leading to unexpected costs as your hiring needs grow.

Choosing the Right Solution: Buyer Scenarios

1. High-Volume Recruiters in Staffing/RPO: Choose NTRVSTA for its efficiency in processing a large number of candidates quickly, with a focus on phone screening.

2. Mid-Sized Tech Companies: If your organization requires multilingual capabilities and fraud detection, NTRVSTA offers a competitive edge over traditional ATS.

3. Retail/QSR Chains: For seasonal hiring spikes, NTRVSTA’s real-time screening can help keep pace with fluctuating demand without overwhelming your team.

Integration Depth: How Well Do They Connect?

NTRVSTA boasts over 50 ATS integrations, including popular platforms like Lever and iCIMS. This extensive integration capability means that organizations can seamlessly incorporate NTRVSTA into their existing workflows without significant disruption. In contrast, many traditional ATS platforms offer limited integration options, which can hinder efficiency and data flow between systems.

Total Cost of Ownership: Beyond License Fees

When evaluating the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO), it’s essential to consider not just the licensing fees but also the implementation time, training costs, and the efficiency gains from reduced screening times. NTRVSTA's streamlined approach can lead to a 30% reduction in hiring costs over a year due to faster candidate processing and higher completion rates.

ROI Analysis: Calculating the Benefits

To illustrate the financial impact, consider the following ROI formula:

ROI = (Total Savings - Total Costs) / Total Costs x 100

Assuming an organization screens 1,000 candidates, with NTRVSTA reducing the screening time from 45 to 12 minutes, the time saved translates to significant cost savings in recruiter hours. If an average recruiter costs $30/hour, the savings could amount to over $12,000 per 1,000 candidates screened.

Conclusion: Actionable Takeaways

1. Assess Your Needs: Identify if your organization requires high-volume screening capabilities or specific features like multilingual support.

2. Evaluate TCO: Look beyond upfront costs and consider long-term savings from improved efficiency with NTRVSTA.

3. Consider Integration: Ensure that any new phone screening solution can easily integrate with your current ATS to avoid data silos.

4. Pilot Program: Run a small pilot with NTRVSTA to evaluate its effectiveness compared to your current ATS before a full rollout.

5. Monitor Metrics: Continuously track candidate completion rates and time-to-hire metrics to gauge the effectiveness of your chosen solution.