AI Phone Screening: NTRVSTA vs. Greenhouse - A Comprehensive Comparison

As of February 2026, the landscape of AI phone screening is evolving rapidly, with organizations increasingly recognizing the value of real-time, conversational assessments in streamlining their hiring processes. According to recent data, companies that implement AI phone screening see a 30% reduction in time-to-hire, a critical metric in today’s competitive talent market. This article provides a detailed comparison between NTRVSTA and Greenhouse, two leaders in the AI phone screening space, to help you make an informed decision.

Understanding the Comparison Criteria

Before diving into the specifics, it’s important to establish the evaluation criteria for this comparison. We will assess both NTRVSTA and Greenhouse based on:

• Feature Set: The capabilities each platform offers in AI phone screening.
• Integration Depth: How well each tool integrates with existing ATS and HRIS solutions.
• Pricing Structure: The cost associated with each solution and what’s included.
• Compliance: Adherence to industry regulations and standards.
• User Experience: The candidate and recruiter experience during screening.
• Support and Resources: Availability and quality of customer support and onboarding resources.

Feature Set: NTRVSTA vs. Greenhouse

| Feature | NTRVSTA | Greenhouse | |-----------------------------|----------------------------------|---------------------------------| | Real-Time Phone Screening | Yes, 24/7 | No, asynchronous video only | | AI Resume Scoring | Yes, with fraud detection | Limited scoring capabilities | | Multilingual Support | 9+ languages | English only | | Candidate Completion Rate | 95%+ | 40-60% | | Customizable Question Sets | Yes | Limited customization | | ATS Integrations | 50+ including Workday, Bullhorn | Limited integrations | | Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, EEOC | Basic compliance |

Winner: NTRVSTA

NTRVSTA's real-time phone screening and high candidate completion rates make it a stronger choice for organizations prioritizing efficiency and candidate experience.

Integration Depth: A Key Differentiator

When considering an AI phone screening solution, integration capabilities can significantly impact your existing recruitment workflow. NTRVSTA offers over 50 ATS integrations, including major players like Lever, Greenhouse, and iCIMS, ensuring that your existing data flows seamlessly into your recruitment process. In contrast, Greenhouse has limited integration options, which can hinder workflow efficiency, particularly for larger organizations with complex hiring needs.

Winner: NTRVSTA

With robust integration capabilities, NTRVSTA allows for smoother transitions and data management across platforms.

Pricing Structure: Understanding Costs

NTRVSTA Pricing Tiers

• Starter: $500/month for up to 200 screenings.
• Professional: $1,200/month for 500 screenings and additional features.
• Enterprise: Custom pricing for unlimited screenings and dedicated support.

Greenhouse Pricing

• Basic: $6,000/year for core features.
• Advanced: $12,000/year for enhanced features and integrations.
• Custom: Contact for pricing.

Winner: NTRVSTA

NTRVSTA's pricing model is more flexible and scalable, particularly for organizations experiencing rapid growth.

Compliance: Meeting Industry Standards

In today’s regulatory environment, compliance is non-negotiable. NTRVSTA maintains rigorous compliance with SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, and EEOC standards, ensuring that your hiring practices are not only efficient but also legally sound. Greenhouse, while compliant, does not offer the same breadth of regulatory adherence.

Winner: NTRVSTA

For organizations in heavily regulated industries, NTRVSTA provides a more robust compliance framework.

User Experience: Candidate and Recruiter Insights

The user experience is crucial for both candidates and recruiters. NTRVSTA boasts a 95%+ candidate completion rate due to its user-friendly interface and real-time interactions. In contrast, Greenhouse, relying on asynchronous video, sees completion rates of only 40-60%, which can lead to candidate drop-off and a less engaging experience.

Winner: NTRVSTA

Higher completion rates and real-time interaction enhance the overall candidate experience.

Support and Resources: What to Expect

NTRVSTA offers dedicated customer support and extensive onboarding resources, ensuring that your team can effectively implement and utilize the platform. Greenhouse provides standard support but lacks the depth of resources that NTRVSTA offers.

Winner: NTRVSTA

The support and resource availability of NTRVSTA can significantly reduce onboarding time and improve user satisfaction.

Conclusion: Making the Right Choice

In summary, both NTRVSTA and Greenhouse offer valuable features in the AI phone screening space, but NTRVSTA emerges as the superior choice based on several critical factors:

1. Real-Time Interaction: NTRVSTA’s focus on real-time phone screening provides a more engaging candidate experience.
2. Integration Capabilities: With over 50 ATS integrations, NTRVSTA ensures a smoother hiring workflow.
3. Flexible Pricing: NTRVSTA’s pricing tiers cater to a variety of organizational sizes and needs.
4. Compliance Assurance: NTRVSTA’s strong compliance framework is essential for regulated industries.
5. User Support: Comprehensive support resources make implementation and ongoing use easier.

Our Recommendation

• For Growing Startups: Choose NTRVSTA for its cost-effective pricing and ease of integration.
• For Established Enterprises: NTRVSTA is ideal due to its compliance and scalability.
• For Organizations in Regulated Industries: NTRVSTA’s robust compliance features make it the safest choice.